FALSE ALARM REDUCTION PROGRAM
 

 

 

 


ADT home security system keypad

 

 

 

ANNUAL REPORT
 

 

 

 

FOR YEAR ENDING 2003
 

 

 


 



False Alarm Reduction

 

 

            The False Alarm Reduction Section (FARS) of the Montgomery County Department of Police completed its eighth year of enforcement under the amended Chapter 3A, Alarms, of the Montgomery County Code.  The FARS reports that the incidence of false alarms continued its downward trend between 2002 and 2003, despite an increase of 7,234 new alarm users.  The FARS also performed outreach to 50 different problem accounts in its “Major Offender” program, successfully completed conversion of the program to the new CAD 9-1-1 system, updated its web site, performed numerous outreach to the community and significantly reduced false alarm dispatch rates for both residential and commercial alarm users.

 

            In calendar year 2003, false alarms to which police officers were required to respond were reduced by 8.3 % over the previous year.  The FARS now shows a full 49.9% reduction in false alarms since enforcement of the False Alarm Reduction Program began in earnest in March 1995.  Additionally, police officers responded to 21,369 less alarm calls in 2003 over 1994.  These statistics, coupled with a 123% increase in the number of registered alarm users over the same time period, clearly shows that substantial false alarm reduction is being achieved and that the alarm law is having its intended effect.

 

 
 

 

 



            Graph 1 – False Alarm Reduction, provides information on the number of requests for dispatch vs. actual responses (dispatched).  The graph also provides information on calls where no response was made, as well as the total number of alarm users.  The graph shows that the number of actual alarm calls to which police officers have responded has continued to decrease, while this year the number of alarm users remained almost exactly the same as last year.  In 2003, there were a total of 44,673 requests for dispatch to alarm activations, down by 1736 over the previous year.  Additionally, police responded to only 21,452 of those requests, or 52%.  There were a total of 21,431 alarm activations to which the police were not required to respond in 2003.

 

            Absent enforcement of the alarm statute, coupled with the increase in alarm users, one would expect that the actual dispatches to alarm activations would increase substantially, or at least at the same rate of growth.  However, actual responses to alarm activations were reduced by 8.3% between 2002 and 2003. 

 

            In 1994, Montgomery County police officers responded on 97.5% of all requests for dispatch (43,936 requests for dispatch with 42,821 actual responses).  However, in 2003, police officers responded to only 52% of all requests for dispatch (44,673 requests for dispatch with only 21,452 actual responses).  This represents a 48% reduction between requests and dispatches, even with 36,718 more alarm users and correlates to a significant savings in police officer time.

 

            One critical enforcement measure in the alarm statute is the requirement that an alarm company cancel a police response when it is determined that an alarm activation is false.  This is achieved through telephone or other electronic verification with the alarm user at the time of alarm system activation.  The high number of non-responses (21,431) was due, in part, to that required cancellation by alarm companies.  The higher the number of cancellations, the better the job the alarm companies are doing of reducing the number of false alarms to which police officers respond.  In 2003, alarm companies cancelled a very impressive 10,057 requests for dispatch, an increase of almost 1,000 calls over 2002.  These cancellations provide officers with more time to engage in other more critical law enforcement related activities and community policing initiatives.

 

            The FARS also continued its strict enforcement of all requirements for requesting dispatch, including providing the correct alarm user registration and alarm business license numbers.  Police officers were not dispatched when an alarm business failed to provide all of the required information to Emergency Communications Center call-takers.  Nor were police dispatched if an alarm user was in a violation status for failure to register, failure to pay a false alarm response fee or failure to upgrade the alarm system when required to do so.  The legally mandated non-response provisions of the alarm law resulted in only 2,121 requests for dispatch that were denied as a result of the violation status of the alarm user or alarm business.  This represents 953 fewer times that alarm companies requested dispatch after being advised of the violation status of their customers.  This decrease is a direct result of enforcement action taken by FARS staff and shows that alarm companies are finally realizing the impact of false alarms and Montgomery County’s commitment to enforcing Chapter 3A, Alarms.

 

            Graph 2 and Chart 1 – Requests for Dispatch vs. Actual Responses depict the difference between the requests for dispatch and the actual responses since 1994.  Requests for dispatch in 2003 declined by more than 2000 calls, while the actual responses to requests is at a new all-time low of 21,452.  This, coupled with the increase in new alarm users, is extremely encouraging and shows how well the alarm law is working.

 

 

 

Chart 1 – Requests for Dispatch vs. Actual Responses

 

 

Year

Requests for

Dispatch

Actual

Responses

Percentage of Total Calls Responded To

2003

44,673

21,452

52.0%

2002

46,409

23,402

50.5%

2001

45,702

24,855

54.4%

2000

48,603

26,877

55.3%

1999

48,434

25,951

53.9%

1998

46,839

25,877

55.3%

1997

45,791

29,219

63.8%

1996

40,534

32,390

79.9%

1995

40,967

35,624

87.0%

1994

43,936

42,821

97.5%


            The false alarm dispatch rate is perhaps the truest measure of false alarm reduction, as it calculates the number of false alarm dispatches relative to the total number of alarm users.  The false alarm dispatch rate is the only rate that takes into account the growth of the alarm user base.  Both residential and commercial false alarm dispatch rates continued to decline in 2003 over 2002.  For the third year in a row, the National Burglar and Fire Alarm Association, an alarm industry trade group, states that Montgomery County has the lowest reported residential, commercial and combined false alarm dispatch rate of any jurisdiction in the country.  The residential false alarm dispatch rate for 2003 was .23.  This means that overall, residential alarm users experience less than one false alarm every four years, which is a remarkable statistic.  The commercial false alarm dispatch rate for 2003 was .88, which is a further reduction from 2002 levels and marks three years running that the commercial rate fell below the 1.0 mark.  Combined residential and commercial false alarm dispatch rates fell to an all-time low of .32 and is the lowest combined reported dispatch rate in the entire country.

 

 

 

Chart 2 – False Alarm Dispatch Rates

 

Type

1994

1995

1996

1997

1998

1999

2000

2001

2002

2003

Residential

N/A

.66

.54

.45

.36

.35

.32

.28

.25

.23

Commercial

N/A

2.29

1.82

1.32

1.06

1.04

1.09

.98

.94

.88

Both

1.43

.98

.78

.61

.48

.44

.44

.38

.35

.32

 

 

 

            Commercial false alarm dispatch rates have been reported as high as 4.0 and residential false alarm dispatch rates as high as 1.0 or above.  A dispatch rate of 4.0 means that every alarm user has four actual responses every year.  Using 2003 statistics, that would equate to 36,964 actual responses to alarm activations for commercial alarm users alone, instead of the 21,431; a figure more than 15,000 over the total responses for residential and commercial alarm users combined in 2003.

 

            Assuming Montgomery County’s dispatch rate would have risen a modest amount to 2.0 without enforcement of the alarm law, police officers would have actually responded to 132,948 alarm activations in 2003, 97% of which would turn out to be false alarms.  At $90 per dispatch, those 132,948 alarm activations would require approximately 43 police officers to do absolutely nothing but respond to burglar alarms at a staggering cost of $11,965,320.  This is clearly a cost that no local jurisdiction can absorb.

 

 


            The following pie charts (Graphs 3, 4 and 5) graphically depict the significant reductions in residential, non-residential and combined false alarm dispatch rates.

 

Graph 3

 

Graph 4

 
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Graph 5

 
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


            In 2003, 1.3% more residential and commercial alarm users experienced no false alarms at all.  A total of 52,762 alarm users, or 79.4%, had zero false alarm activations to which police officers responded in 2003.  The pie graphs on the following page show that each year more alarm users achieve the zero false alarm threshold.  This statistic, which is supported by the low false dispatch rate, is indicative of the success of the overall false alarm reduction program.  These reductions become more significant when viewed with the steady increase in the number of alarm users each year.

 


 

Threshold Statistics

 

 

 

 
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


            2003 Alarm Users = 66,474                                       2001 Alarm Users = 64,836

 

 

 

 
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


            1999 Alarm Users = 58,143                                       1997 Alarm Users = 48,008

 

 

 

            As a direct result of the FARS’s strict enforcement of the alarm law, there were 21,431 alarm calls to which police officers were not required to respond in 2003. This equates to savings in 2003 of approximately $1,928,790 and 14,301 hours of police officer time, or 13.75 police work years.  (Monetary savings are based on a cost of $90 per response.  Work year savings are based on an average of 20 minutes per alarm response by two officers.)  This timesaving is substantial, particularly when the department is being asked to do more with less each year. 

 


            The following graphs illustrate the revenues, hours and work years saved as a result of the false alarm reduction program.

 

Graph 6 shows that the actual revenue saved in 2003 as a result of police officers responding to 21,431 less false alarms was $1,928,790.  Since the FARS began enforcement of the alarm statute, the total revenue saved by Montgomery County has been $9,313,030.

 

(The dramatic difference in 2002 savings and subsequent years is due to using a more realistic figure of $90 per response, as opposed to $55 in 2001 and $50 for previous years.)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
 

 


Graph 7 shows that the actual hours saved in 2003 as a result of police officers responding to 21,431 less false alarms was 14,301 hours.  Since the FARS began enforcement of the alarm statute, Montgomery County has recovered 100,243 hours in police officer time.

 

 
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


Graph 8 shows that 13.75 actual work years were saved in 2003 as a result of enforcement of the alarm statute.  Since enforcement began, Montgomery County has recovered a total of 61.82 work years of police officer time. 

 

(The dramatic difference starting in 2002 vs. previous years is due to erroneously using a full 2080 hours as a work year measure between 1994 and 2001, which is not an accurate figure.)


            The total savings in dollars, hours and work years since 1994 have been significant and are depicted in Chart 3 below.  As stated previously in this report, absent strict enforcement of the alarm statute, Montgomery County would have paid more than $11,000,000 in 2003 alone responding to false alarms.  The $9,313,030 savings to the county is, therefore, even more significant.

Chart 3 – Cumulative Savings

 

 

Year

Revenue

Saved

Hours

Saved

Work Years

Saved

1994

$     55,750

     743

  .35

1995

$   242,750

  3,236

1.56

1996

$   366,950

  4,892

2.35

1997

$   752,850

10,038

4.82

1998

$   968,550

12,914

6.21

1999

$1,046,600

13,954

6.71

2000

$1,008,600

13,448

6.47

2001

$1,046,430

12,684

6.10

2002

$1,895,760

14,043

13.5

2003

$1,928,790

14,301

13.75

 

 

 

 

TOTAL

$9,313,030

100,243

61.82

 

            In calendar year 2003, the FARS had 497 registered federal, state and local government facilities, all of which were held to the same strict standards as all other alarm users.  Of the 497 government alarm users, only 97 or 20%, had at least one false alarm.  This shows a decrease of 4% over 2002.  Those 97 alarm users collectively had 132 false alarms.  A total of 400 different government alarm users (80.5%) had zero false alarms, which surpasses statistics for all other alarm users by a slight margin (79.4%).  The following chart reflects government alarm user activity for 1999 through 2003.

 

Chart 4 – Government Alarm Users