The rolling fields and farmland in the Upper Rock Creek watershed have
changed in recent years as homes and businesses have replaced former dairy
farms or corn fields. People can still remember when brown trout were
regularly caught in the clear running waters of Rock Creek. Today, brown
trout still survive in these streams, but are becoming increasingly harder
to find. The Upper Rock Creek watershed contains many miles of small headwater
streams unlike Lower Rock Creek and other down-County watersheds, where
prior development piped many headwater areas.
The Upper Rock Creek watershed is located in the central portion of the
county and is the first major Potomac tributary west of the Anacostia
River drainage. Upper Rock Creek is bounded by Dorsey Road (near Laytonsville)
to the north, Olney-Laytonsville Road (Route 108) to the east, Route 28
to the south, and the Gaithersburg-Laytonsville Road (Route 124) to the
west.
Rock Creek begins as a small spring emerging from an old spring house
in the Laytonsville area. The upper reaches of the watershed (above Fieldcrest
Road) are still relatively undeveloped. The County has acquired protective
stream valley park land buffers along the upper Rock Creek main stems
to help maintain the good to excellent resource conditions currently found
here. Relatively unimpaired, this portion of Rock Creek supports several
of the County's reference stream reaches. Passing under Fieldcrest Road,
Rock Creek soon joins another main headwater tributary just above the
Agricultural History Farm Park. The Agricultural History Farm Park was
one of the first County parks to be master planned with stream resource
protection goals and objectives included in the plan text.
Land uses in the drainage area from Fieldcrest Road downstream to Muncaster
Road consist of newly developing large lot residential subdivisions, commercial
uses along Route 124, and existing low to medium density residences. Under
State law, many of the existing large lot developments have not had to
provide stormwater quantity controls, although some have had to provide
water quality controls for runoff. Some subdivisions now being constructed
will be required to provide full quantity and quality runoff controls.
Between Muncaster Road and Muncaster Mill Road, Rock Creek increases in
size as its drainage area enlarges. Medium density residential development
predominates, although there are still areas of large lot developments
in the drainage. The stream valley in this area is in succession from
farm fields to young forest.
Mill Creek currently has a poor to fair resource condition reflecting
the density of development in its headwaters that was built with little
or no SWM controls. This area has a combination of townhouses, single
family homes, and apartments. The Crabbs Branch subwatershed has a highly
impervious commercial area in its headwaters and the Crabbs Branch Regional
Stormwater Pond was constructed to control the runoff from these facilities.
The Southlawn Branch has an old industrial area in its headwaters that
includes cement mixing facilities and sand and gravel operators. There
are few stormwater runoff controls in this area. DEP monitoring at the
outfall from the Southlawn Branch industrial area indicated an alkaline
pH problem in the discharge. DEP is working with different cement mixing
facility owners to improve on-site BMPs to reduce the pollutant discharges
from these properties. An old landfill (Gude) in this subwatershed currently
has a methane recovery system in place and BMP's to provide control of
the runoff from the site. Lake Needwood is eutrophic, and downstream of
the lake the water temperature and quality are noticeably impaired.
Upper Rock Creek Stream
Condition, Habitat Conditions, and Management Category Designation
| Subwatershed/Stream Condition |
Habitat Conditions |
Primary Factors Affecting Stream Condition |
Unique Characteristics and Management Designation |
| Upper Rock Creek - EXCELLENT (preliminary
in upper reaches) |
GOOD Overall, Excellent in areas |
Problems observed stemming from sediment deposition
and embeddedness, most likely from past agricultural activities |
Watershed Protection Area - special
level |
| Mainstem Farm Park - GOOD |
GOOD |
Instream habitat degraded; sediment deposition,
bank stability problems |
Watershed Protection Area - special
level |
| Mainstem Farm Park B - EXCELLENT |
GOOD |
Sediment deposition, bank instability in areas;
habitat not as impaired as above |
Watershed Protection Area - special
level |
| Airpark Road Branch - FAIR |
FAIR |
Impacts to riparian area and problems with sediment
deposition and bank stability |
Watershed Restoration Area |
| Pope Farm Branch -EXCELLENT |
GOOD |
Flow conditions are a limiting factor; some sediment
deposition |
Watershed Protection Area - special |
| North Fraley Farm - EXCELLENT
(preliminary) |
GOOD (preliminary) |
Bank stability problem. Beaver activity noted. |
Watershed Protection Area - special |
| Mainstem Fraley Farm - GOOD (preliminary) |
GOOD (preliminary) |
Bank stability problems observed. Beaver activity
has been noted. |
Watershed Protection Area - special |
| North Lake Needwood - EXCELLENT |
GOOD |
Aquatic insect community in the high excellent range
- some bank stability problems |
Watershed Protection Area - special |
| Mill Creek (Upper) - POOR
(preliminary) |
GOOD Overall (preliminary) |
In-stream habitat conditions a limiting factor -
impacts from high imperviousness |
Watershed Restoration
Area |
| South Mill Creek - FAIR |
GOOD Overall |
Bank stability problems, however fish community
somewhat improved in this lower section. |
Watershed Restoration Area |
| Lake Needwood Tribs.- FAIR (preliminary) |
GOOD Overall (preliminary) |
Low imperviousness overall, however lake and recreational
facilities have an impact Lake is eutrophic (poor). |
Watershed Restoration
Area |
| Crabbs Branch - GOOD (preliminary) |
GOOD Overall (preliminary) |
Stormwater management facility mitigates impacts
from upstream imperviousness - stability and in-stream habitat generally
good below pond. |
Watershed Protection Area - regular
(outside City of Rockville) |
| Southlawn Branch - POOR
(preliminary) |
GOOD (preliminary) |
In-stream habitat fair. High imperviousness and
water quality impacts from industrial uses impact biological community. |
Urban Watershed Management Area
(outside City of Rockville) |
| Croydon Park Trib. - FAIR (preliminary) |
GOOD to FAIR (preliminary) |
High imperviousness in headwaters affects channel
stability. |
City of Rockville
|
| Lower Croydon - POOR |
GOOD Overall |
In-stream habitat, particularly substrate, affected
by runoff. |
City of Rockville |
| Upper North Branch A - GOOD |
GOOD Overall Excellent
in areas |
Benthic community showing signs of impact - embeddedness
and sediment problems. |
Watershed Protection Area - special |
| Upper North Branch B - EXCELLENT |
GOOD Overall |
Strong indicators in the biological community. Habitat
condition may be the result of previous agricultural uses. |
Watershed Protection Area - special |
| Middle North Branch A and B -
GOOD(preliminary in lower reach) |
FAIR (preliminary in lower reach) |
Fish community showing signs of stress. Impairment
in areas immediately downstream may be affecting this area. |
Watershed Protection Area - remedial |
| Williamsburg Run - FAIR (preliminary
in upper reaches) |
FAIR (preliminary in upper reaches) |
Very "flashy" stream hydrology - serious
problems observed with sediment depositions, embeddedness, bank stability. |
Watershed Restoration
area |
| Lower North Branch A - FAIR |
FAIR |
Serious problems with sed. deposition and bank stability. |
Watershed Restoration Area |
| Cherrywood Manor -EXCELLENT |
GOOD |
High quality stream reach, but stream banks are
showing signs of destabilization. |
Watershed Protection Area - special |
| Lower North Branch B -Excellent |
GOOD |
Very low existing imperviousness in this area. |
Watershed Preservation Area |
| Lower North Branch C - Excellent |
GOOD |
|
Watershed Protection Area - special |
| Brooke Manor - FAIR(preliminary) |
no current data |
|
Watershed Restoration Area |
| Lake Frank East - GOOD (preliminary) |
GOOD Overall (preliminary) |
Inadequate riparian buffer in areas. |
Watershed Protection Area - regular |
| Manor Run - POOR |
POOR |
Problems observed with in-stream habitat. |
Watershed Restoration Area |
| Lake Frank Tribs. |
no current data |
Lake is eutrophic (poor). |
Watershed Protection Area |
Upper Rock Creek Watershed Management Categories
The Upper Rock Creek watershed contains many subwatersheds supporting
excellent stream conditions. Some of these areas are fragmented by stream
sections showing signs of impairment, and the overall resiliency of this
high quality headwater system is somewhat compromised by this pattern.
Measures to improve and stabilize impacted areas will greatly benefit
the overall function of this system. Many of the areas currently supporting
"good" stream conditions may be capable of supporting an excellent
community through targeted efforts to improve, stabilize and protect areas
showing signs of stress. Many of these areas are projected to have only
modest increases in imperviousness. Planning efforts in the Upper Rock
Creek watershed have emphasized preserving the health of this stream system,
as well as protecting the valued recreational resources and maintaining
the flood protection benefits provided by Lake Needwood. DEP is in the
process of developing a watershed restoration action plan for addressing
stormwater retrofit, stream restoration, and habitat improvements comprehensively
throughout the watershed. The management approach outlined below will
be updated as necessary to incorporate feasibility study results and watershed
restoration action plan recommendations.
Watershed Preservation Areas
This category includes the Lower North Branch subwatershed. The low levels
of existing and projected imperviousness in Lower North Branch should
continue to preserve the excellent conditions found here, in combination
with efforts to maintain and improve upstream conditions.
| Watershed Management Strategy |
- Pursue efforts as part of a comprehensive watershed action plan to
address upstream conditions.
Watershed Protection Areas
This designation includes all of the subwatersheds currently assessed
as supporting excellent or good stream conditions, with the exception
of Lower North Branch which is discussed above.
Special level of protection
Special protection tools are recommended for many of the headwater areas
to protect the sensitive resources in these streams where projections
of imperviousness indicate the highest levels of subwatershed land use
change may occur.
| Watershed Management Strategy |
- Target efforts to maintain and improve forested riparian buffer areas
through various options (e.g. conservation easements, parkland acquisition
and/or dedication, targeted off-site forest conservation, voluntary
implementation by landowners, etc.)
- Develop and implement public education program residents, businesses
and developers to increase awareness of stream resources and special
management needs.
- Pursue imperviousness reduction strategies, targeted habitat improvements
- Identify habitat improvement opportunities through development of
overall watershed restoration action plan.
Remedial level of protection
Middle North Branch A and B are identified for remedial levels of protection
in order to address existing habitat impairment and other problems in
these subwatersheds. Imperviousness is not projected to increase to over
10% in these areas, and the potential for restoring these areas to a level
supporting excellent stream conditions may exist.
| Watershed Management Strategy |
- Identify and pursue opportunities for stream restoration and habitat
improvement projects as part of development of the overall watershed
restoration action plan.
Regular level of protection
Three areas are identified for regular levels of protection, Crabbs Branch,
Lake Frank and Lake Frank East. These subwatersheds contain good stream
conditions which should continue to be protected by the application of
standard environmental guidelines and regulations. Potential habitat improvement
or structural improvements at the Crabbs Branch pond will be examined
through the Rock Creek watershed feasibility study being conducted by
DEP.
| Watershed Management Strategy |
- Continue current practices.
- Identify and pursue opportunities for stream restoration and habitat
improvement projects as part of development of the overall watershed
restoration action plan.
Watershed Restoration Areas
All of the subwatersheds supporting fair or poor stream conditions are
identified as watershed restoration areas, with the exception of Southlawn
Branch.
| Watershed Management Strategy |
- Identify and pursue opportunities for stream restoration and habitat
improvement projects as part of development of the overall watershed
feasibility study and restoration action plan.
- Increase public education and outreach efforts, including involving
local citizens in Pipe Detectives and pollution prevention efforts.
Urban Watershed Management Area
Southlawn Branch is designated an urban watershed management area out
of the need to address existing urban water quality impacts in this watershed
as a first priority.
| Watershed Management Strategy |
- Continue efforts to work with businesses in identifying pollution
prevention measures to improve water quality conditions.
- Identify and pursue stormwater retrofit opportunities through the
overall watershed feasibility study and restoration action plan.
Land Cover Graph |

|
[ Home ]
[ Up ][ Lower Rock Creek Watershed ]
[ Upper Rock Creek Watershed ]
[ Home ]
[ Up ]
[ Broad Run Watershed ]
[ Cabin John Watershed ]
[ Dry Seneca Watershed ]
[ Great Seneca Creek Watershed ]
[ Hawlings River Watershed ]
[ Little Bennett Creek ]
[ Little Falls Watershed ]
[ Little Monocacy Watershed ]
[ Little Paint Branch Watershed ]
[ Little Seneca Watershed ]
[ Muddy Branch Watershed ]
[ NW Branch Watershed ]
[ Paintbranch Watershed ]
[ Patuxent River Watershed ]
[ Rock Creek Watershed ]
[ Rock Run Watershed ]
[ Sligo Creek Watershed ]
[ Watts Branch Watershed ]
|