T&E ITEM 3
July 22,2010
Worksession
MEMORANDUM
TO:
FROM:
Transportation, Infrastructure, Energy and Environment Committee
'ichael Faden, Senior Legislative Attorney
Amanda Mihill, Legislative
AnalY~~~~}lt~
Worksession:
Expedited Bill 40-10, Stormwater Management - Revisions
SUBJECT:
Expedited Bill 40-10, Stormwater Management - Revisions, sponsored by the Council
President at the request of the County Executive, was introduced on June 29, 2010. A public
hearing was held on July 13 (see written testimony, ©42-77). Council action on this Bill is
tentatively scheduled for September 21, assuming that this Committee has finished its work by
then.
Bill 40-10 would require management of stormwater runoff through the use of
non structural best management practices to the maximum extent practicable for new
development and redevelopment projects approved by the Department of Permitting Services,
and generally bring local stormwater management requirements into compliance with the
Maryland Stormwater Management Act of 2007 and the state implementing regulations adopted
this year.
Fiscal impact
OMB's fiscal impact statement (see ©87-88) estimates that modest fee
increases will eventually be necessary to fund certain costs triggered by this Bill.
Issues/Questions
1) Grandfather provisions
Are the grandfather provisions in ©7-8, lines 156-184, and
©21, lines 517-525, optional or required? The state does not require local jurisdictions to adopt
a grandfather provision, but if a jurisdiction does it must track the state regulations (which the
provisions in this Bill do). (The state grandfather regulations are shown on ©78-79.) Executive
branch staff emphasize that the Bill does not assume blanket approval of all administrative
waivers (the term used for grandfathering), but rather would subject each administrative waiver
request to a "good cause" test, with the burden on the applicant to show good cause to approve
the waiver (see ©7, lines 157-160). Councilmember Berliner asked if staff from the Maryland
Department of the Environment (MDE) could attend this worksession, but none were available;
however, they will be able to answer questions forwarded to them.
 PDF to HTML - Convert PDF files to HTML files
2) Redevelopment
This Bill continues the current County policy of requiring a higher
storrnwater management standard for redevelopment than the state requires. Under the state law
and implementing regulations, environmental site design (ESD) is required to control 50% of the
first inch of rainfall in a redevelopment project, but the County would require it to control 100%
(see table on ©41). Environmental organizations support this higher standard, while building
industry representatives are not happy with it but are not contesting it.
3) Waivers
Testimony from environmental organizations focused on the Bill's waiver
provisions on ©21, lines 508-516, urging that these provisions be deleted. The waiver authority
in the current law, shown on ©21, lines 526-528 and on ©21-22, lines 531-555, appears to be
less restrictive than the Bill's language. Nonetheless, environmental groups urged that the
waiver provisions be tightened further and consolidated, as well as more explicitly placing the
burden of proof on the applicant for a waiver (see Storrnwater Partners memo, ©89-90).
4) Environmental organizations' issues
The Storrnwater Partners memo, received after
the public hearing, (see ©89-92) summarizes major issues that environmental organizations have
raised. (Also see the letter from Linda Silversmith on ©47.) Department ofPerrnitting Services
(DPS), Planning staff, building industry representatives, and Council staff are able to discuss the
issues not already covered.
5) Interagency coordination
While DPS is clearly the lead agency for storrnwater
reviews, the Planning Board is also directly involved. At the hearing, Councilmember Knapp
asked how the two agencies will work together on this issue. The Planning staffs memo to the
Board (see ©82-83 in particular) identified some coordination issues which the staff believes
involve this Bill as well as the agencies' administrative practices. (The Planning Board did not
send its official position in time to be printed in this packet.)
In addition, Council staff has revised the Bill's language in certain places to be consistent
with Council drafting standards and returned to the current section numbering in Chapter 19 to
avoid confusing and unnecessary renumbering.
This packet contains:
Circle
#
Expedited Bill 40-10 with technical amendments
1
Legislative Request Report
38
Memo from County Executive
39
Diane Cameron testimony and letter
42
Linda Silversmith letter
47
Maryland-National Capital Building Industry Ass'n testimony
48
State grandfather regulation
78
Planning staff memo
80
Fiscal impact statement
87
Storrnwater Partners memo
89
F:\LAW\B [LLS\l 040 Stonnwater Management-Revisions\T &E Memo 7-22-1 O.Doc
2
 PDF to HTML - Convert PDF files to HTML files
Expedited Bill No.
40-10
Concerning: Stormwater Management -­
Revisions
Revised:
7/20/10
Draft No. 2
Introduced:
June 29,2010
Expires:
December 29,2011
Enacted: _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __
Executive: _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __
Effective: _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __
Sunset Date:
_N:..:.o~n~e~_.,--~
_ __
Ch. _ _, Laws of Mont. Co. _ _ __
COUNTY COUNCIL
FOR MONTGOMERY COUNTY, MARYLAND
By: Council President at the Request of the County Executive
AN EXPEDITED ACT
to:
(l)
(2)
(3)
require management of stormwater runoff through the use of nonstructural best
management practices to the maximum extent practicable for new development and
redevelopment projects approved by the Department of Permitting Services;
bring local stormwater management requirements into compliance with the
Maryland Stormwater Management Act of2007; and
generally amend County law regarding stormwater management.
By amending
Montgomery County Code
Chapter 19, Erosion, Sediment Control and Storm Water Management
Sections 19-20 through 19-35
By adding
Montgomery County Code
Chapter 19, Erosion, Sediment Control and Storm Water Management
Sections 19-21A[[,J]
mlQ
19~1A[[!
19-23An
Boldface
Underlining
[Single boldface brackets]
Double underllD.JD.g
[[Double boldface brackets]]
* * *
Heading or defined term.
Added to existing law
by
original
bill.
Deletedfrom existing law
by
original
bill.
Added
by
amendment.
Deletedfrom existing law or the
bill by
amendment.
Existing law unaffected
by bill.
The County Council for Montgomery County, Maryland approves the following Act:
 PDF to HTML - Convert PDF files to HTML files
ExPEDITED BILL
No.
40~10
1
Sec. 1. Sections
19~20
through 19-35 are amended, and Sections 19­
2
3
4
21A[611 [[and 23A)) and 19-22A are added as follows:
19-20. Purpose of article; scope.
The purpose of this Article is to protect, maintain and enhance the public
health, safety, and general welfare by establishing minimum requirements and
procedures to control the adverse impacts associated with increased stormwater
runoff from developed and developing lands.
[The policy of the County is to
5
6
7
8
minimize damage to public and private property, reduce the effects of development
on stream water quality, control stream channel erosion, reduce local flooding, and,
to the extent reasonable, maintain the pre-development runoff characteristics of land
after development through proper management of stormwater runoff.) The primary
goal of the County is to maintain after development, as nearly as possible, the
predevelopment runoff characteristics, and to reduce stream channel erosion,
pollution, siltation and sedimentation, and local flooding
Qy
implementing
environmental site design to the maximum extent practicable and using appropriate
structural best management practices only when necessary. The 2000 Maryland
Stormwater Design Manual and any [[subsequent])
Qy
reference as if fully [[set forth))
cont~inecl
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
lat~
revisions are incorporated
in this Article.
19-21. Definitions.
*
Administrative wazver:
*
*
21
A decision
Qy
the Department to allow the
~
22
23
24
construction of
f!
development to be governed
Qy
the County stormwater
management law in effect as of May
2009.
An
administrative waiver is distinct
from
f!
waiver granted under Section 19-25.
Agricultural land management practice:
[[Those methods))
Any
m~tQQd
25
26
27
or
[[procedures])
RL()_~dure
used in the cultivation of land in order to further crop and
livestock production and conservation ofrelated soil and water resources .
.(j;­
f:llawlbillsl1 040 stormwater management-revisionslbill2.doc
 PDF to HTML - Convert PDF files to HTML files
EXPEDITED BILL
No. 40-10
28
*
Approval:
*
*
29
30
A documented action
Qy
the Department after a reVIew to
determine and acknowledge the sufficiency of submitted material to meet the
requirements of
~
31
32
33
34
specified stage in the County's development review process.
Approval does not mean an acknowledgement
Qy
the Department that submitted
material has been received for review.
*
*
*
35
36
Best management practice:
A structural device or nonstructural practice
designed to temporarily store or treat storm water runoff to mitigate flooding, reduce
pollution, recharge groundwater, and provide other amenities related to the
management of storm water runoff.
37
38
39
40
41
*
*
*
,
Channel protection storage volume:
The volume used to design structural best
management practices to control stream channel erosion.
42
43
44
45
*
Concept plan:
*
*
The first of
~
required plan approvals that includes the
information necessary to allow an initial evaluation of
~
proposed project.
*
*
*
46
47
48
49
50
51
Design Manual:
The [applicable) 2000 Maryland Stormwater Design
Manual~
as revised from time to time, which serves as the official guide for stormwater
management principles, methods, and practices in Maryland.
*
*
*
Drainage area:
That area[, which is enclosed by a ridge line,] that contributes
runoff to a single point, measured in a horizontal plane.
Environmental site design
[[or))
(ESD1:
52
53
54
Using small-scale stormwater
management practices, nonstructural techniques, and better site planning to mimic
natural hydrologic runoff characteristics and minimize the impact of development on
.()).
f:\Iaw\bills\1040 stormwater management-revisions\biIl2.doc
 PDF to HTML - Convert PDF files to HTML files
EXPEDITED BILL
No.
40~10
55
56
,57
water resources. Methods [[for designing]) to
4~ign
ESD practices are specified in
the Design Manual.
*
*
*
58
59
60
Final project approval:
Approval of the final stormwater management plan
and erosion and sediment control plan required to construct
£!
project's stormwater
management facilities.
Final project approval also includes securing bonding or
61
62
63
financing for final development plans if either is required as
£!
prerequisite for
approval.
Final stormwater management design plan:
The last of
1
required plan
64
65
66
approvals that includes the information necessary to allow all approvals and permits
to be issued
by
the appropriate authority.
*
Impervious area:
*
*
67
68
69
70
Any surface that prevents or significantly impedes the
infiltration of water into the underlying soil, including any [[structures, buildings,
patios, decks, sidewalks))
stI'Y&tyr~buildi~atio,
deck.
si4~wlll~
compacted
gravel, pavement, asphalt, concrete, stone, brick, tile, swimming [[pools]) pQol:!
[[and]] or artificial turf. Impervious surface also includes [[all areas]] anY.J!r.ea used
by
or for motor vehicles or heavy commercial equipment, regardless of surface
~
71
72
73
or material, including any [[roads]] Load:! road [(shoulders]]
driy~way"
should~L
[[driveways]]
74
75
[[and]] or parking [[areas]]
ar~a.
Infiltration:
The passage or movement of water into the soil surface.
Maximum
extent practicable
76
77
78
[[or)]
{MEPl:
Designing stormwater
management systems so that all reasonable opportunities for using environmental site
design planning techniques and treatment practices are exhausted and, only where
absolutely necessary,
£!
structural best management practice is implemented.
Nonstructural maintenance:
Grass cutting; removal of litter and debris, tree
79
80
81
limbs, algae and aquatic plants; tree and shrub trimming and removal; maintenance
Q
f:\Jaw\bills\1040 stonnwater managemenl-revisions\bill 2.doc
 PDF to HTML - Convert PDF files to HTML files
EXPEDITED BILL
No.
40-10
82
83
of fences; aesthetic improvements such as graffiti removal, and any other
[[enhancements]] enhancement in and around
f!
stormwater management facility that
[[are]]
not [[necessarilyl1 essential [[for ensuring]] to ensure that the facility
84
85
continues to function properly.
86
87
*
*
*
On-site stormwater management:
The design and construction of [a facility]
storm water practices to control [all] stormwater runoff in a development.
88
89
90
91
92
Overbank flood protection volume:
The volume controlled
lIT
structural
practices to prevent an increase in the frequency of out of bank flooding generated
lIT
development.
*
Director's designee
*
*
93
94
Planning Director:
The Director of the County Planning DepartInent. or the
95
96
97
98
Planning techniques:
A combination of strategies employed early in project
design to reduce the impact from development and to incorporate natural features
into
.f!
storm water management plan.
*
Preliminary project approval:
*
*
99
100
101
102
103
An
approval as part of the Department's
preliminary development or planning review process that includesU.11l at
[[.f!
minimum]]
(ill
the number of planned dwelling units or lots;
the proposed project density;
the proposed size and location of all land uses for the project;
®
(£}
104
105
106
107
108
@.f!
plan that identifies:
ill
ill
the proposed drainage patterns;
the location of [[all points)] each point of discharge from the site;
and
f:\law\bills\1040 stormwater management-revisions\bill 2.doc
 PDF to HTML - Convert PDF files to HTML files
EXPEDITED BILL
No.
40-10
109
110
111
112
ill
the
~
location, and SIze of [[all]]
stormwater
management [[measures]]
measure based on site-specific
stormwater management requirement computations; and
ill
any other information required
Qy
the Department, including:
113
114
ill
the proposed alignment, location, and construction
~
and
standard for [[all roads]] any road, access [[ways]] way.'! and
[[areas]]
of vehicular traffic;
115
116
117
118
119
ill
ill
~
demonstration that the methods
Qy
which the development will
be supplied with water and wastewater service are adequate; and
the size,
~
and general location of all proposed wastewater
and water system infrastructure.
120
121
122
*
(a)
(b)
*
*
Redevelopment:
Any construction, alteration, or improvement [which] that:
exceeds or equals 5,000 square feet ofland disturbance; and
is performed on a site where the existing land use is commercial,
industrial, institutional, or multifamily residential and existing
imperviousness is greater than 40 percent.
123
124
125
126
*
*
*
127
Site development stormwater management plan:
The second of
1
required
128
129
plan approvals [[that include]] which includes information necessary to allow
detailed evaluation of
~
proposed project.
Stabilization:
the prevention of soil movement
Qy
any of various vegetative or
130
131
132
structural means.
Stormwater:
[That precipitation which travels over natural, altered, or
133
134
impervious surfaces to the nearest stream, channel, conduit, or impoundment and
appears in surface waters. Stormwater also includes snow melt] Water that originates
from
[[il:]]
precipitation
[[event]]~
135
0-
f:\law\bills\1040 stormwater management-revisions\bill 2.doc
 PDF to HTML - Convert PDF files to HTML files
EXPEDITED BILL NO.
40-10
136
137
138
Stormwater management:
The collection, conveyance, storage, treatment, and
control of stormwater [runoff] as needed to reduce accelerated
erosion, increased flood damages, or water pollution.
channel
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
Stormwater management facility:
An infiltration device, [vegetative filter,]
filtering device, stormwater pond, stormwater wetland, hydrodynamic structure,
[channel, pipe, weir, orifice, or combination of those measures,] or other [[best
management]] practice designed and constructed to control stormwater [runoff] to
reduce accelerated stream channel erosion and pollution of surface waters.
A
stormwater management facility does not include environmental site design practices
or any nonstructural stormwater management system.
*
*
*
Stormwater management system:
Natural areas, environmental site design
practices, stormwater management measures, and any structure through which
stormwater flows, infiltrates, or discharges from
~
site.
148
149
150
Structural
maintenance:
The
inspection,
construction,
reconstruction,
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
modification, [or] repairJ. and cleaning of any part of a stormwater management
facility undertaken to assure that the facility remains in the proper working condition
to serve its intended purpose and prevent [structural] failure. Structural maintenance
does not include landscaping, grass cutting, or trash removal.
*
19-21A. Grandfathering.
*
*
W
The Director may, for good cause shown, grant an administrative
to
£!
development that received
before May
~
~
preliminary project approval
2010. Administrative waivers expire as provided under
subsection
(Q)
and may be extended as provided under subsection
~
(Q)
Expiration of an administrative waiver.
o
f:\law\bills\1040 stormwater management-revisions\bill 2.doc
 PDF to HTML - Convert PDF files to HTML files
EXPEDITED BILL
No. 40-10
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
ill
Except as provided in subsection
must expire on:
!£1
an administrative waiver
®
(ID
May:h 2013, if the development does not receive final
project approval before that date; or
May:h 2017, if the development receives final project
approval before May :h 2013.
ill
All construction authorized under an administrative waiver must
be completed by:
®
(ID
May:h2017;or
if the waiver is extended under subsection
!£1
[[hy]] the
~ires.
[[expiration]) date [[ofl] the waiver [[extension]]
.c9
Extension of an administrative waiver.
ill
ill
Except as provided in paragraph
Q1
an administrative waiver
must not be extended.
An
administrative waiver may only be extended
11
hy May :h
2010 the development:
®
(ID
received
f!:
preliminary project approval; and
was subject to
f!:
development rights and responsibilities
agreement or
f!:
tax increment financing approvaL
ill
An
administrative waiver extended under paragraph
ill
expires
when the development rights and responsibilities agreement[LJ]
or the tax increment financing approval[[.1 or the annexation
agreement]] expires.
19-22. Watershed management plans.
(a)
The Department of Environmental Protection, in cooperation with the
Department, the Board, and other appropriate agencies, may develop
watershed management plans to implement stormwater management
@
f:\law\bills\1040 stormwater management-revisions\bill 2.doc
 PDF to HTML - Convert PDF files to HTML files
EXPEDITED BILL
No. 40-10
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
policies that apply individually to specific watersheds in the County.
Each watershed management plan should:
*
(5)
*
*
specifY the types of [quantitative] stormwater management,
stream restoration and wetlands protection practices to be
implemented;
*
(7)
*
*
specifY where the [Department] Director may grant waivers of
on-site stormwater management controls;
*
*
*
[[19-23]] 19-22A. Stormwater management measures.
ill
An
applicant must use the ESD planning techniques and practices and
structural stormwater management measures established in this Article
and the Design Manual, either alone or in combination, in
.9:
storm water
management plan. An applicant must demonstrate that environmental
site design has been implemented to the maximum extent practicable
before [[the use
Qfll
.9:
structural best management practice is
[[consideredn included in [[developing the]] g stormwater management
plan.
fJi}
ESD planning techniques andpractices.
ill
An
applicant must
.9:PPlY
the following planning techniques
according to the Design Manual to satisfy the on-site stormwater
management requirements of Section [[19-25])19-24:
®
preserve and protect natural resources;
conserve natural drainage patterns;
mInImIZe ImpervIOUS area;
. . ..
.
ill}
reduce runoff volume;
-0
f:\law\bills\1040 stormwater management-revisions\bill 2.doc
 PDF to HTML - Convert PDF files to HTML files
EXPEDITED BILL
No. 40-10
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
{£)
tID
®
use ESD practices to maintain 100% of the average annual
predevelopment groundwater recharge volume for the site;
use green roofs, permeable pavement, reinforced turf, and
other alternative surfaces;
(Q)
limit soil disturbance, mass grading, and compaction;
(H)
cluster development; and
any practice approved
Qy
the Administration.
ill
m
An
applicant must design the following ESD treatment practices
according to the Design Manual to satisfy the on-site stormwater
management requirements of Section [[19-25]] 19-24:
®
ill)
disconnection of rooftop runoff;
disconnection of nonrooftop runoff;
(Q)
sheetflow to conservation areas;
(D)
rainwater harvesting;
submerged gravel wetlands;
landscape infiltration;
tID
®
(H)
(G) infiltration berms;
ID:y
wells;
micro-bioretention;
rain gardens;
swales;
enhanced filters; and
ill
ill
(K)
QJ
(M) any practice approved
Qy
the Administration.
ill
The use of ESD planning techniques and treatment practices
specified in this Section must not conflict with existing State or
County laws.
Structural stormwater management [[measures]] practices.
@
f:\law\bills\1040 stormwater managemenl-revisions\bill2.doc
 PDF to HTML - Convert PDF files to HTML files
EXPEDITED BILL No.
40-10
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
ill
An
applicant must design the following structural stormwater
management practices according to the Design Manual to satisfy
the on-site stormwater management requirements of Section [[19­
25]] 19-24:
(A)
(ID
(Q2
stormwater management ponds;
stormwater management wetlands;
stormwater management infiltration;
stormwater management filtering systems; and
stormwater management open channel systems.
(D)
@
ill
An
applicant must consider the performance criteria specified in
the Design Manual with regard to general feasibility, conveyance,
pretreatment,
landscaping,
treatment
and
and
geometry,
when
environment
selecting
and
maintenance
structural
stormwater management practices.
ill
An applicant must select structural stormwater management
practices to accommodate the unique hydrologic or geologic
[[regions]] region of the County where the property to be
developed is located.
@
An
applicant may use an alternative ESD planning [[techniques and]]
technique or treatment [[practices and]]
practice or structural
stormwater management [[measures]] measure for new development
runoff control if [[they meet]] it meets the performance criteria
established in the Design Manual and [[are]]
Administration. [rrractices])
Any
practice used for
approved
Qy
the
~
redevelopment
[[projects]] omiect must be approved
Qy
the Department.
W
[[For purposes oft] Before modifying the on-site stormwater control
requirements or design criteria, the applicant must submit to the
@-
f:\law\bills\1 040 stonnwater management-revisions\bill 2.doc
 PDF to HTML - Convert PDF files to HTML files
EXPEDITED BILL
No. 40-10
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
Department an analysis of the impacts of stormwater flows downstream
in the watershed. The analysis must include hydrologic and hydraulic
calculations necessary to determine the impact of hydro graph timing
modifications of the proposed development [[upon]]
~
dam,
highway, structure, or natural point of restricted streamflow, established
with the Department's concurrence, downstream [[ofJ] from the first
downstream tributary whose drainage area equals or exceeds the
contributing area to the project or storm water management facility.
[[19-23A. Specific design criteria.]]
[[The basic design criteria, methodologies, and construction specifications,
subject to the approval of the Department and the Administration, must be those of
the Design Manual.]]
[19-23] [[19-24]] 19-23. Review and approval of stormwater management plans.
(a)
Concept plan.
Before the Board may approve a preliminary plan of
subdivision, an applicant must submit a stormwater management and
sediment control concept plan to the Department for review and
approval.
[If a preliminary plan of subdivision or site plan is not
required, the applicant must submit a stormwater management concept
plan to the Department for review and approval before submitting an
application for a sediment control permit.]
[[All plans]] Each plan
submitted for concept approval must provide sufficient information for
the Department to make an initial assessment of the proposed project
and determine whether stormwater [[management]] can be [[provided]]
managed according to this Article and the Design Manual.
Each
concept plan is subject to the following conditions and requirements:
ill
A natural resources inventory must be reviewed and approved
Qy
the Department or the [[Hoard]] Planning Director before the
@
f:llaw\bills\1040 stonnwater management-revisions\bill2.doc
 PDF to HTML - Convert PDF files to HTML files
EXPEDITED BILL
No.
40-10
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
applicant submits
Section.
[(1)]
~
concept plan [[as required]] under this
ill
The
plan must indicate how the stormwater management and
sediment control criteria will be applied to each proposed
development or redevelopment project.
The Department may
require a plan to analyze the downstream effects of any proposed
development or redevelopment project. [The plan must indicate
how the development will minimize any interference with or
addition to the current flow of water onto adjacent properties.
The
applicant
may
include
structural
and
nonstructural
stormwater management measures in the plan.] The basic design
criteria~
[[and]] methodologies, and construction specifications
used in developing the plan must be [[consistent with criteria]]
specified in the Design Manual and any other criteria established
by regulation.
ill
The plan must describe how environmental site design practices
will be implemented to the maximum extent practicable and
[[provide for]] allow use of ani'. structural best management
[[practices]] practice only where the applicant [[is able to
demonstrate
to
the
Director's
satisfaction]]
shows
that
environmental site design or [[other]] another nonstructural best
management [[practices are]] practice is not!! viable option.
318
319
320
321
322
ill
The plan must include [[the
(A)
~
followingll~
Department~
map; at!! scale specified.Qy the
showing site
location, existing natural features, water and other sensitive
resources, topography, and natural drainage patterns;
@
f:\law\bills\1 040 stormwater management-revisions\bill 2.doc
 PDF to HTML - Convert PDF files to HTML files
EXPEDITED BILL
No.
40-10
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
.ill}
the anticipated location of [[all]} each proposed impervious
[[areas, buildings, roadways, parking, sidewalks, utilities]]
area, building, roadway, parking. sidewalk. utility, and
other site [[improvements]]
improvement~
(!:J
the location of the proposed limit of disturbance, erodible
soils, steep slopes, and
illlY [[
areas]] area to be protected
during construction;
@
preliminary
estimates
of
stormwater
management
requirements, the [[selection and]] location of each ESD
[[practices]] practice to be used, and the location of [[all
points]] each point of discharge from the site; and
.em
[(2)]
any other information the Director requires.
ill
Any stormwater management plan must be consistent with any
watershed
management
plan
that
the
Department
of
Environmental Protection has approved or any flood management
plan that the [Maryland Department of the Environment]
Administration has approved involving the site of the proposed
development or redevelopment project.
[(3)]
(§J
The Department must refer the concept plan [back] to the
Department of Environmental Protection, the Department of
Transportation, and the Board for comment before approving the
plan [if the Board so requests].
[(4)
The Department may require incrementally more specific
submittals at each stage of the approval process for a project
which requires site plan or development plan review.]
ill)
Site development stormwater management plan.
Before the Board may
approve
~
site plan, the applicant must submit
~
site development
-@-
f:\lawlbills\1040 stonnwater management-revisions\bill 2.doc
 PDF to HTML - Convert PDF files to HTML files
EXPEDITED BILL
No. 40-10
350
351
352
353
354
355
356
357
358
359
360
361
362
363
364
365
366
367
368
369
370
371
372
stormwater management plan to the Department for review and
approval. The applicant may combine the site development stormwater
management plans with the concept [[plans]] Plan required under
subsection
(ill
if [[acceptable to]] the Director approves.
Any site
development stormwater management plan submitted for review and
approval must include [[the
following]]~
ill
ill
all information provided during the concept plan reVIew
[[phase]]~
final site layout, exact impervious area locations and acreages,
proposed topography,
~
delineated drainage [[areas]] area at [[all
points]] each point of discharge from the site, and stormwater
volume computations for ESD practices and structural measures;
ill
~
proposed erosion and sediment control plan that contains the
construction sequence, any phasing necessary to limit earth
disturbances and impacts to natural resources, and an overlay
plan showing the [[types]]
~
and [[locations]] location of each
ESD and erosion and sediment control [(practices]] practice to be
used;
ill
~
narrative that supports the site development design, describes
how ESD will be used to meet the minimum control
requirements, and justifies any proposed structural stormwater
management measure; and
ill
[(b)]
any other information the Director requires.
373
374
375
376
W
[Design] Final stormwater management design plan.
ill
Any person required under this Chapter to obtain a sediment
control permit must include a final stormwater management
design plan as part of the permit application.
The final
-0
f:\lawlbills\1 040 stormwater management-revisions\bill 2.doc
 PDF to HTML - Convert PDF files to HTML files
EXPEDITED BILL
No.
40-10
377
378
379
380
381
382
383
384
385
386
387
388
389
390
391
392
393
394
395
396
397
398
399
400
401
sionnwater management design plan must confonn to both the
concept plan and site development stonnwater management
[concept] plan and serve as the basis for all later construction.
[All construction specifications must adhere to the requirements
in the Design Manual and any applicable regulations.]
applicant must submit
~
The
final stonnwater management design
plan for approval in the fonn of construction drawings
accompanied
Qy
~
report that includes sufficient infonnation to
evaluate the effectiveness of the proposed runoff control design.
The applicant must also submit
~
final erosion and sediment
control plan under [[Section 26.17.01.05 of the Maryland Code
ofl] applicable State Regulations[[.'l as amended]]:.
Any plan
submitted under this paragraph must meet all [[of the]]
requirements ofthe Design Manual.
ill
Any report submitted for final stonnwater management design
plan approval must include[[.'l but is not limited to]t
®
geotechnical investigations,.. including soil maps, borings,
site-specific
infonnation
~
recommendations,
necessary
for
and
the
any
final
additional
stonnwater
management design;
ill}
drainage area map depicting predevelopment and post­
development runoff flow path segmentation and land use;
(Q
hydrologic computations of the applicable ESD and
unified sizing criteria according to the Design Manual for
[[all points]] each point of discharge from the site;
-@
f:\law\bills\1040 stotmwater managemenl-revisions\bill2.doc
 PDF to HTML - Convert PDF files to HTML files
EXPEDITED BILL
No. 40·10
402
403
404
405
406
407
408
409
410
411
412
413
ill)
hydraulic and structural computations for [[all]] each ESD
[[practices]]
practice
and
structural
stormwater
management [[measures]] measure to be used; and
.cID
~
narrative that supports the final stormwater management
design.
ill
Construction
drawings
submitted
for
final
stormwater
but are not
management design plan approval must
limited
to]]~
include[[~
®
~
vicinity map;
.cru
existing and proposed topography and any proposed
drainage area, including any area necessary to determine
downstream analysis for [[the}] each proposed stormwater
management [[facilities]] facility;
414
415
416
417
418
419
.co
any proposed improvement, including the location of any
building or other structure, impervious surface, storm
drainage facility, and all grading;
(D)
the location of any existing and proposed structure;
any easement and right-of-way;
the delineation, if applicable, of the 100-year floodplain
and anyon-site [[wetlands]] wetlang;
420
421
422
423
424
425
426
427
.cID
ill
(G)
structural and construction details", including representative
cross sections for [[all components]] each component of
the proposed drainage system or systems and stormwater
management facilities;
(H)
all necessary construction specifications;
~
ill
sequence of construction;
@
f:\law\bills\1040 stormwater management-revisions\bill2.doc
 PDF to HTML - Convert PDF files to HTML files
EXPEDITED BILL
No.
40-10
428
429
430
431
432
433
434
435
436
437
438
439
440
441
442
443
444
445
446
447
448
449
450
451
452
453
454
ill
09
data for total site area, disturbed area, new impervious
area, and total impervious area;
~
table showing the ESD and unified slzmg criteria
volumes required in the Design Manual;
OJ
(M)
~
table of materials to be used for stormwater management
facility planting;
[[all]] each soil boring [[logs]]
!2g
and [[locations]]
location;
®
(Q)
an inspection and maintenance schedule;
certification
Qy
the [[owner/developer]] applicant that all
stormwater management construction will be [[done]]
com12k1ed according to this plan; and
!R)
an as-built certification signature block:, to be executed
after project completion.
ill
The maintenance schedule required under this Section must cover
the life of any structural stormwater management facility or
system of ESD practices and must specify the maintenance to be
completed, the time period for completion, and the responsible
l2ill1Y
that will perform the maintenance.
management plan.
[(c)]
@
Plan preparation.
The maintenance
schedule must be printed on the approved final storm water
The Director may reqUIre the stormwater
management concept.1 site development stormwater management.. and
final storm water management and design plans to be prepared by a
professional engineer, professional land surveyor, registered architect or
landscape architect licensed in Maryland, or any other individual whose
qualifications are acceptable to the Department. If a storm water best
-@
f:\Iaw\bills\1 040 stonnwater management-revisions\bill 2.doc
 PDF to HTML - Convert PDF files to HTML files
ExPEDITED BILL
No.
40-10
455
456
457
458
459
460
461
462
463
464
465
466
467
468
469
470
471
472
473
474
475
476
477
478
479
480
management practice reqUIres either a dam safety permit from the
[Maryland Department of the Environment] Administration or a small
pond approval from the District, the Director must require the design
plan to be prepared by a professional engineer licensed by the State of
Maryland.
ill
Runoff
If
~
storm water management plan involves direction of some or
all runoff off [[of the]] site,
[[n
is]] the [[developer's responsibility to))
developer must obtain from any adjacent property owner any easement
or other necessary property interest concerning water flow. Approval of
~
stormwater management plan does not create or [[affect]] imply any
right to direct runoff onto any adjacent property without that property
owner's permission.
[19-24] [[19-25]] 19-24. On-site requirements; County participation; waivers.
(a)
On-site stormwater management.
ill
A person that receives [a building permit or] a sediment control
permit must provide on-site stormwater management unless the
Director waives this requirement.
ill
The Director may waive the on-site stormwater management
requirement ifthe Director finds that:
(A)
environmental site design has been implemented to the
maximum extent practicable.. and stormwater from the site
is safely conveyed to
~
Department approved off-site
facility that has been constructed to provide stormwater
management for the site; or
ill)
on-site stormwater management
applicable State law.
IS
not required under
-(2)
f:\law\bil/s\1040 stormwater managemenl-revisions\bill 2.doc
 PDF to HTML - Convert PDF files to HTML files
EXPEDITED BILL No.
40-10
481
482
483
484
485
486
487
488
489
490
491
492
493
494
495
496
497
498
499
ill
[[The use
oft]
ESD planning techniques and treatment practices
must be [[exhausted]] used to the maximum extent practicable
under the Design Manual before any structural best management
practice
[[may~]]
is
implemented. A stormwater management
plan for
!!
development project subject to this Article must be
designed using the ESD sizing criteria, recharge volume, water
quality volume, and channel protection storage volume criteria
according to the Design Manual. The MEP standard is met when
channel stability is maintained, predevelopment groundwater
recharge is replicated, nonpoint source pollution is minimized,
and structural stormwater management practices are used only if .
[[determined to be]] absolutely necessary.
*
(c)
Waiver.
(1)
*
*
An applicant seeking a waIver of anyon-site stormwater
management requirement must submit a request to the
Department in writing in a form acceptable to the Director. [The
applicant must submit a separate written request for each later
addition, extension, or modification to a development that has
received a waiver.1
500
501
ill
A request for quantitative storm water control Waivers must
contain sufficient descriptions,
drawings,
and
any
other
502
503
information that is necessary to [[demonstrate1] show that
environmental site design has been implemented to the maximum
extent practicable. The applicant must submit
!!
separate written
request for each later addition, extension, or modification to
!!
development that has received
!!
waiver.
504
505
506
507
-@
f:\law\bills\1040 stormwater management-revisions\bill 2.doc
 PDF to HTML - Convert PDF files to HTML files
EXPEDITED BILL
No. 40-10
508
509
510
ill
Except as provided in paragraph
G1
stonnwater management
qualitative control waivers
~
only to:
(A) an infill development project where environmental site
design is not feasible;
511
512
513
.em
{g
~
redevelopment project if the applicable requirements of
this Article are satisfied; or
~
514
515
516
517
518
519
520
521
522
523
524
525
526
527
528
529
530
531
site where [[the Director detennines that]] circumstances
exist that prevent the reasonable implementation of
environmental site design.
(±}
The Director may grant
~
stonnwater management quantitative
and qualitative control waiver for
~
phased development project if
~
system designed to meet the 2000 State and County regulatory
requirements [[under State and County law]] for multiple phases
was constructed
by
May
i"
2010.
If the 2009 regulatory
requirements cannot be met for any future [[phases]] phase
constructed after May
i"
2010, the applicant must [[demonstrate]]
make all reasonable efforts to incorporate environmental site
design in each future [[phases]] phase.
[(2)] (iLThe Director may grant a waiver if the applicant shows that
existing physical conditions prevent full compliance with any on­
site stonnwater management requirement.
However, the
applicant must still demonstrate that environmental site design
has been implemented to the maximum extent practicable.
[(3)] {QLIf a site is an infil1 development or redevelopment site, the
Director may waive channel protection requirements[,] if all
reasonable options for implementing environmental site design to
the maximum extent practicable have been exhausted, and:
532
'533
534
@
f:\law\bills\1040 stormwater management-revisions\bill2.doc
 PDF to HTML - Convert PDF files to HTML files
EXPEDITED BILL
No.
40-10
535
536
537
538
539
540
541
542
543
544
545
546
547
548
549
550
551
552
553
554
555
556
557
558
559
560
(A)
the planned development or redevelopment project will not
increase the impervious surface area on the site; or
(B)
runoff from the site will drain through an adequately-sized
existing improved storm drain system before discharging
into a natural stream channel, without adversely affecting
the receiving channel, and the discharge to the storm drain
system will not increase erosion in the receiving waters.
[(4)
The Director may also waive channel protection requirements if:
(A)
an off-site facility was designed and constructed to provide
the necessary runoff controls for the site; and
(B)
the facility's design assures non-erosive conveyance of
runoff from the site to the facility.]
[(5)]
ill
The Director [may] must not grant a waiver [only if] unless:
(A)
the applicant satisfies criteria established by regulation;
and
(B)
the waiver
management
IS
consistent with an applicable watershed
if any, prepared by the applicant and
plan~
approved by the Department of Environmental Protection.
[(6)]
®
The Director may grant each waiver only on a case-by-case
basis. The Director must consider the cumulative effects of all
waivers granted in a drainage area or watershed. [[The]]
E~ch
waiver must reasonably ensure that the proposed development
will not adversely impact stream quality.
[(7)] (2} When a waiver is granted, the Director must require the
applicant to:
(A)
provide a monetary contribution;
-@
f:\law\bills\1040 stonnwater management-revisions\bill2.doc
 PDF to HTML - Convert PDF files to HTML files
EXPEDITED BILL
No. 40-10
561
562
563
564
565
566
567
568
569
570
571
572
573
574
575
576
577
578
579
580
581
582
583
584
585
586
587
(B)
grant an easement or dedicate land for the County to
construct a stormwater management facility; or
(C)
take specific stream or wetland restoration measures.
[19-25) [[19-26)) 19-25. Contributions, dedications, and stream restoration.
*
(c)
*
*
Stream and wetlands restoration measures.
[The) For redevelopment
only, the Department may allow an applicant to construct stream or
wetland
restoration
measures
instead
of
[on-site
storm water
management controls) monetary contributions or dedications if:
(1)
the Director of Permitting Services and the Director of
Environmental Protection both find that it is in the County's best
interest for the applicant to provide stream or wetland restoration
measures; and
(2)
the estimated cost of the stream or wetland restoration measures
do not exceed the estimated cost of on-site stormwater
management controls that the applicant would otherwise be
required to [construct] provide for new development.
[19-26) [[19-27)] 19-26. Stormwater management design criteria.
(a)
[Each applicant must use recharge volume, water quality volume, and
channel protection storage volume sizing criteria to design a stormwater
management facility for new development as required by the Design
Manual and any applicable regulation. Each applicant must also use
water quality volume and channel protection storage criteria for any
redevelopment project.) [[Unless otherwise indicated, redevelopment is
subject to the same requirements that are applicable to new development
under this Article.))
nonstructural
Each applicant must use planning techniques,
and
design
methods
to
implement
practices,
@-
f:\lawlbills\1040 stolTllwater management-revisionslbill 2.doc
 PDF to HTML - Convert PDF files to HTML files
EXPEDITED BILL
No.
40-10
588
589
590
591
592
593
594
595
596
597
598
599
600
601
602
603
604
605
606
607
608
609
610
611
612
613
environmental site design to the [[MEP standard)) maximum extent
practicable. The use of environmental site design must be exhausted
before any structural best management [[practices are)) practice is used.
Each stormwater management [[plans]] plan must be designed using
ESD sizing criteria, recharge volume, water quality volume, and
channel protection storage volume sizing criteria.. according to the
Design Manual and any applicable regulation. If the Department finds
that historical flooding problems exist at the site of a new development
or redevelopment project, the Director may require the use of overbank
flood protection volume [and1:! extreme flood volume criteria:! or both.
(b)
[The Director may reduce the minimum control requirements if the
applicant incorporates nonstructural stormwater management measures
into the site design plans in accordance with the Design Manual and any
applicable regulations.1 Unless otherwise indicated, redevelopment is
subject to the same requirements that apply to new development under
this Article.
For redevelopment, the applicant may use alternative
stormwater management measures to satisfy the requirements in
subsection
liD
if the applicant [[satisfactorily demonstrates to the
Director]] shows that impervious area reduction and environmental site
design have been implemented to the maximum extent practicable. The
use of environmental site design for redevelopment projects must not
reduce the density [[established]] allowable under [[the County Zoning
Code,]] Chapter 59 and any master [[plans, and]] or sector [[plans]]
plan. Alternative stormwater management measures include [[:! but are
not limited
t011~
ill
an on-site structural best management practice;
1
'
~
h?24
f:\law\bills\1040 stormwater management-revisions\bill2.doc
 PDF to HTML - Convert PDF files to HTML files
EXPEDITED BILL 1\10.
40-10
614
615
616
617
618
619
620
621
622
623
624
625
626
627
628
629
630
631
6
'"'?
-'­
ill
an off-site structural best management practice to provide water
quality treatment; or
ill
~
combination of impervious area reduction, environmental site
design implementation, and an on-site or off-site structural best
management practice within the limit of disturbance.
[(
c)
The applicant may use alternative structural and nonstructural practices
to satisfy water quality volume requirements if the Director finds that
those practices satisfy the criteria in the Design Manual and any
additional criteria established by regulation.
The Department must
approve any alternative practice used for either a new development or
redevelopment project.
The Administration must also approve any
alternative practice used for a new development project.]
[19-27] [[19-28]] 19-27. Financial security.
(a)
Required.
(1)
Before Issumg a [building] sediment control permit for a
development which requires a stormwater management [facility]
system, the Director must require the applicant or owner to
furnish a performance or cash bond, irrevocable letter of credit,
certificate of guarantee, or other instrument from a financial
institution or issuing person satisfactory to the Director and the
County Attorney, for construction of the on-site stormwater
management [facility] system in an amount equal to the estimated
cost of the construction.
633
634
635
636
637
638
639
640
*
(3)
*
*
The bond, letter of credit, certificate of guarantee, or other
instrument must be conditioned on the faithful performance of the
terms and conditions of an approved stormwater management
-@
f:\Jaw\bills\1040 stormwater management-revisions\bill 2.doc
 PDF to HTML - Convert PDF files to HTML files
EXPEDITED BILL
No. 40-10
641
642
643
644
645
646
647
648
649
650
651
652
653
654
655
656
657
658
659
660
661
662
663
664
665
666
667
plan and construction of the [facility] system as provided in that
plan and under this Article. The bond, letter of credit, certificate
of guarantee, or other instrument must inure to the benefit of the
County if the applicant or owner does not comply with the
conditions of the bond, letter of credit, certificate of guarantee, or
other instrument.
(b)
Release.
(1 )
The Director must not release a bond, letter of credit, certificate
of guarantee, or other instrument until the [Department, after a
final inspection,] applicant has [found] submitted "as-built" plans
and the Department has issued
f!
certification of completion based
on the Director's finding, after having performed
f!
final
inspection, that the stormwater management [facility) system
complies with the approved plan and this Article.
(2)
The Department may agree with an applicant regarding the stages
of the work to be done on the [facility) system. After completing
each stage, the applicant must notifY the Department that the
applicant is ready for an inspection and, after the Director
certifies that the applicant has completed that stage of work under
the approved plan and this Article, the Director may reduce the
bond, letter of credit, certificate of guarantee, or other instrument
pro rata, or may direct the Director of Finance to refund to the
applicant a prorated share of the amount that the applicant
deposited with the County.
*
[facilities)
systems.
*
*
[19-28) [[19-29]] 19-28. Inspection and maintenance of stormwater management
@
f:\lawlbills\1040 stormwater management-revisionslbill 2.doc
 PDF to HTML - Convert PDF files to HTML files
ExPEDITED BILL
No. 40-10
668
669
670
671
672
(a)
Installation inspections.
(1)
The [Department] Director, or [an individual]
~
person designated
.by
the applicant that is also qualified and approved by the
Department to supervise construction, must inspect each
[stonnwater]
best
management
[facility]
practice
under
673
674
675
676
677
678
679
680
681
682
683
684
685
686
687
688
689
690
691
692
693
construction as needed to certify the [facility's] system's
compliance with approved plans. The inspector must conduct
each inspection as provided in a checklist or in any other manner
that the Department has approved for each type of stormwater
management [facility] system.
written
inspection
report
The inspector must prepare a
includes
[[the
following
that
infonnation]] :
(A)
(B)
the date and location of the inspection;
whether construction [complied]
complies with the
approved stonnwater management plan;
(C)
any variation from approved construction specifications;
and
(D)
any [[violations]] violation of law or regulations that the
inspector observes.
(2)
The Department must notify the applicant in writing if the
inspector observes any [[violations]] violation of this Article
during the inspection.
The written notice must describe the
nature of [[the]] each violation and prescribe any corrective
action needed.
(3)
Construction work on a stonnwater management [facility] system
must not proceed until the Department:
f:\law\bills\1040 storrnwater management-revisions\biIl2.doc
 PDF to HTML - Convert PDF files to HTML files
EXPEDITED Bill
No.
40-10
694
695
696
697
698
699
700
701
702
703
704
705
706
707
708
709
710
711
(A) inspects and approves the work previously completed or
the plans and certifications previously submitted; and
(B) furnishes the inspection reports to the applicant after each
inspection.
ill
Once construction is complete, the applicant must submit as-built
plan certification to the Department to ensure that ESD planning
techniques, treatment practices,
and structural
stormwater
management measures and conveyance systems comply with the
specifications [[contained]] in each approved [[plans]] plan. At
~
minimum, as-built certification must include
~
set of drawings
comparing the approved stormwater management plan with what
was
constructed.
The Director may require
additional
information if needed.
ill
[[All]] Each as-built [[plans]] plan submitted to the Department
under this subsection must be prepared
.Qy
~
design professional
or other person qualified and approved
.Qy
the Department.
[(b)
Inspection and maintenance of off-site facilities.
The Department of
Environmental Protection must inspect and approve each off-site
stormwater
maintenance.
management
facility
for
acceptance
for
County
712
713
After a facility is accepted, the Department of
714
715
716
717
718
719
Environmental Protection must inspect each underground facility at
least once each year and each above-ground facility at least once every
3 years, and must maintain each accepted facility in good working
condition.]
[(c)]
(hl
[Inspection and maintenance] Maintenance ofnew [on-site facilities]
stormwater management systems.
-@-
f:\law\bills\1040 stormwater management-revisions\bill 2.doc
 PDF to HTML - Convert PDF files to HTML files
EXPEDITED BILL
No.
40-10
720
721
722
723
724
725
726
727
728
729
730
731
732
733
734
735
736
737
738
(1) Before issuing a [building] sediment control permit to develop
any property that requires [an on-site stormwater management
facility] implementation of best management practices, the
Department must require the property owner to execute an
easement and an inspection and maintenance agreement that is
binding on [[all]] [later] [[subsequent owners]] each later owner
of the land to be served
Qy
any private stormwater management
system.
(2)
The easement [and agreement] must give the County a perpetual
right of access to the [facility] stormwater management system at
all reasonable times[[,]] to inspect, operate, monitor, install,
construct, reconstruct, modity, maintain, clean, or repair any part
of the stormwater management [facility] system within the area
covered
Qy
the easement as needed to assure that the [facility]
system remains in proper working condition under approved
design and environmental standards.
The inspection and
maintenance agreement must require the owner to be responsible
for all maintenance of any completed ESD treatment system and
nonstructural maintenance of [the] anyon-site stormwater
management facility if the development consists of residential
property or associated nonresidential property. Otherwise, the
inspection and maintenance agreement must require the owner to
be responsible for all maintenance of the [facility] entire on-site
stormwater
management
system,
including
[structural
739
740
741
742
743
744
745
746
maintenance] maintaining in good condition, and promptly
repairing and restoring, [[aU]) each ESD [[practices]] practi<&
grade [[surfaces, walls, drains, dams]] surface, wall.
drain~am
f:\law\bills\1040 stormwater management-revisions\bill 2.doc
 PDF to HTML - Convert PDF files to HTML files
EXPEDITED BILL
No.
40-10
747
748
749
750
751
752
753
and [[structures]] structure, vegetation, erosion and sediment
control [[measures]] measure, and any other protective [[devices
in perpetuity]] device forever.
*
(5)
*
*
[The Department of Environmental Protection must inspect each
County- maintained underground facility at least once every year
and each County-maintained above-ground facility at least once
every 3 years.] Any repair or restoration and maintenance
performed under this Section must [[be in accordance]] comply
with each previously approved or newly submitted [[plans]] plan
and any reasonable corrective measure specified
Qy
the Director
of Environmental Protection.
754
755
756
757
758
759
760
[(d)]
(£)
[Inspection and maintenance] Maintenance of existing [on-site]
stormwater management facilities.
(1)
The owner of [an on-site]
~
761
762
763
stormwater management facility that
is not subject to subsection [(c)]
(Q}
must perform all structural
maintenance needed to keep the facility in [property] proper
working condition.
The owner of a residential property or
764
765
766
767
768
associated nonresidential property, or a homeowners' association
[which] that includes the residential property, may execute a
stormwater management easement granting the County a
perpetual right of access to inspect, operate, monitor, install,
construct, reconstruct, modifY, maintain, clean, or repair any part
of the storm water management facility within the easement as
needed to assure that the facility remains in proper working
condition under approved design standards.
769
770
771
772
-§-
f:\law\bills\1040 stormwater management-revisions\bill 2.doc
 PDF to HTML - Convert PDF files to HTML files
EXPEDITED BILL
No. 40-10
773
774
775
776
777
778
779
(2)
If the owner of a stonnwater management facility grants a
stonnwater management easement to the County, the owner must
make any structural repairs needed to place the facility in proper
working condition, as detennined by the Department of
Environmental Protection, before the County enters into an
inspection and maintenance agreement with the owner that
obligates the County to assume responsibility for structural
maintenance of the facility. After the owner and the County have
agreed that the County will assume responsibility for structural
maintenance of the facility, the owner must record in the County
land records the easement and any other [[agreements]]
agreement executed in conjunction with the easement that [[are
binding
on]]
binds any later [[owners]] owner of the land. The
owner must deliver a certified copy of each recorded document to
the Department of Environmental Protection.
780
781
782
783
784
785
786
787
788
789
(3)
After the Department of Environmental Protection receIves a
certified copy of the easement and agreements, the County must
structurally maintain and inspect the facility as provided
in
subsection
[c]
(Q}.
790
791
792
[(e)
@
Abandonment instead of repair.]
Maintenance inspections.
793
794
795
ill
The Department of Environmental Protection must [inspect each]
ensure preventive maintenance [[through inspection
ofl]
J2y
inspecting all stonnwater management [facility to see what
repairs, if any, are needed to restore the facility to proper working
condition. If the Director of Environmental Protection fmds that
the stonnwater management facility is no longer needed to
796
797
798
799
@-
f:\law\bills\1040 stormwater management-revisions\biIl2.doc
 PDF to HTML - Convert PDF files to HTML files
EXPEDITED BILL
No.
40-10
800
801
802
803
804
805
806
807
808
809
810
811
812
813
814
815
816
817
818
819
820
821
822
823
824
825
control stormwater runoff or that the benefits of a repaired
stormwater management facility are not justified by the cost of
repair, the owner of the stormwater management facility must
abandon the use of the facility for stormwater functions as the
Director of Environmental Protection orders. Any order issued
under this subsection must not restrict the facility from being
used for recreational or other purposes not related to stormwater
control.] systems. The inspection must occur during the first year
of operation and then at least once every
J.
years.
ill
[[Inspection reports must be maintained
Qy
the]]
Th~
Department
of Environmental Protection must maintain an inspection report
for [[all]] each stormwater management [[systems and]] §J':stem.
Each report must include ([the
following]]~
(A)
ill)
the date of inspection;
name of inspector;
the condition of each:
©
ill
(ii)
(iii)
vegetation or filter [[media]]
medium~
[[fences]] fence or other safety [[devices]] device;
[[spillways, valves]] spillway, valve, or other
control [[structures]]
structure~
(iv)
[[embankments, slopes]] embankment. slope.'). and
safety [[benches]] bench;
ill
(vi)
reservoir or treatment [[areas]) area;
inlet and outlet [[channels]] channel or [[structures]]
structure;
(vii) underground drainage;
-@
f:\law\bills\1 040 stormwater management-revisions\bill 2.doc
 PDF to HTML - Convert PDF files to HTML files
EXPEDITED BILL
No.
40-10
826
827
(viii) sediment and debris accumulation in storage and
forebay areas;
(ix)
[[any]] nonstructural [[practices]] practice to the
extent practicable; and
828
829
830
831
ill
CD)
[[any]] other item that could affect the proper
function ofthe storm water management system; and
832
833
834
835
836
837
838
~
description of any needed maintenance.
ill
The owner of any privately maintained stormwater management
system must correct [[the deficiencies]]
each. deficiency
discovered during the inspection within the time period specified
in any written notice issued
hy
the Director of Environmental
Protection.
Abandonment instead
gf
repair.
If the Director of Environmental
839
840
841
Protection finds that the stormwater management facility is no longer
needed to control stormwater runoff or that the benefits of
~
repaired
stormwater management facility are not justified
hy
the cost of repair,
the owner of the stormwater management facility must abandon the use
of the facility for stormwater functions as the Director of Environmental
Protection orders.
842
843
844
845
Any
order issued under this subsection must not
~QY
restrict the facility from being used for
recreational or other
846
847
848
849
[[purposes)] pyrnose not related to stormwater control.
(f)
Nonstructural maintenance of [on-site] stormwater management
facilities.
The owner of [an on-site]
~
stormwater management facility
must [provide landscaping and] perform [any other] routine inspection
and nonstructural maintenance that impacts the effectiveness of routine
structural maintenance, performed either privately or publicly. Among
other actions, the owner must:
850
851
852
®
f:\Iaw\bills\1040 stonnwater management-revisions\bill 2.doc
 PDF to HTML - Convert PDF files to HTML files
EXPEDITED BILL
No. 40-10
853
854
855
856
857
858
859
860
861
862
863
864
865
866
867
868
869
870
871
872
(1)
prevent the accumulation of solid waste on the property and the
generalized growth of weeds or plants in violation of Section 58­
3;
(2)
clear any woody vegetation, including trees and brush along with
their root systems, within 25 feet of the facility's control structure
and within 15 feet of an upstream or downstream dam
embankrnent;and
(3)
abate any other condition on the property that the Department of
Environmental Protection reasonably finds may adversely affect
the facility's proper functioning.
*
(h)
*
*
Stop work orders.
ill
If
~
maintenance inspection reveals that the maintenance, repair,
or restoration of
performed in
~
~
stormwater management facility is being
~
manner that is hazardous, creates
nuisance, or
endangers human life or the property of others, or is otherwise
being preformed in an unauthorized manner, the Director of
Environmental Protection may, without advance [[warning]]
notice.'! post [[the site with]]
f!
stop work order at the site directing
that all maintenance, repair, or restoration activity [[cease]] must
stop immediately.
873
874
875
876
877
ill
The Director of Environmental Protection must provide written
notice to the property owner, any designated representative of the
property owner, or anyon-site person in charge of the work when
~
stop work order is issued. That notice must specify the extent
878
879
to which work is stopped and the conditions under which work
may resume.
®
f:\law\bills\1040 stormwater management-revisions\biIl2.doc
 PDF to HTML - Convert PDF files to HTML files
exPEDITED BILL
No. 40-10
880
881
882
883
884
885
886
887
888
889
890
891
892
893
894
895
896
897
898
899
900
901
902
903
904
905
906
ill
A person must not continue, or allow the continuance
Qb
work on
~
stormwater management facility covered by
~
stop work order,
~ nuisance[[~])
except for work necessary to abate [[the]]
or
hazardous [[conditions as]] condition identified by the Director.
ill
Emergency authority.
If,
after
inspection,
the
Director
of
Environmental Protection finds that the condition of a privately
maintained stormwater management facility presents an immediate
danger to the public health or safety because of an unsafe
improper construction,
or poor maintenance, the
condition~
[or)
Director of
Environmental Protection may take any needed [[actions]] action to
protect the public and make the facility safe, including entering the
property to make any needed [[repairs]) repair. The County must assess
any [[costs]] cost incurred as a result of the Director of Environmental
Protection's actions against each owner ofthe facility. The County may
collect the costs in the same manner as real property taxes are collected
against the property where the facility is located.
In addition, the
County may seek reimbursement under any other method legally
available to collect debts owned to the County.
[19-29.] [[19-30]] 19-29. Stormwater management loan program.
*
[19-30.] [[19-31)] 19-30. Regulations.
*
*
*
[19-31.] ([19-32]] 19-31. Exemptions.
*
*
The following development activities are exempt from the stormwater
management requirements under this Article:
(a)
agricultural land management [activities1 practices;
*
*
*
f:\Iaw\bills\1040 stormwater management-revisions\bill2.doc
®
 PDF to HTML - Convert PDF files to HTML files
ExPEDITED BILL
No. 40-10
907
908
909
910
911
912
913
914
915
916
917
918
919
920
921
922
923
924
925
926
927
928
929
930
931
932
933
[19-32] [[19-33]] 19-32. Transition for approved plans.
Each new development or redevelopment project must comply with this
Article, except [that:
(a)
A previously approved] when the Department issues final sediment
control and stormwater management [concept] design plan [remains
valid if the Department issues a sediment control permit] approval for
the property covered by the plan before May
~
2010. [July 1, 2003.
The applicant must construct the stormwater management system within
2 years after the Department issues the sediment control permit.
(b)
A residential lot containing 2 or more acres is exempt from anyon-site
stormwater management requirement if the preliminary plan creating
the lot was approved before July 1,2002 and the Department issues the
sediment control permit before July 1,2003.] \
[19-33] [[19-34]] 19-33. Agreements between the County and municipalities.
>I<
*
>I<
(c)
If a municipality operates a stormwater management program that
serves substantially the entire municipality and meets all applicable
federal and [state] State standards, the County must reimburse the
municipality, subject to appropriation, for the cost of operating the
program, limited to the amount the Director of Environmental
Protection estimates the County would spend for that municipality if it
were operating the program, by means of a cooperative agreement under
subsection (b).
[19-34. Reserved.] 19-34. Reserved.
19-35. Water Quality Protection Charge.
(a)
As authorized by [state] State law (Maryland Code, Environment Art., §
4-204), the Director of Finance must annually impose and collect a
~
£3'6\
f:\law\bills\1040 stormwater management-revisions\biIl2,doc
 PDF to HTML - Convert PDF files to HTML files
EXPEDITED BILL
No.
40-10
934
935
936
937
938
939
940
941
942
943
944
945
946
947
948
949
950
951
952
953
954
955
956
957
958
959
960
Water Quality Protection Charge, as provided in this Section.
The
Director must collect the Charge in the same manner as County real
property taxes, apply the same interest, penalties, and other remedies
(including tax sale) if the Charge is not paid, and generally treat the
Charge for collection and administration purposes as if it were a County
real property
tax.
The Director may treat any unpaid Charge as a lien
on the property to which the charge applies.
(b)
The Charge must be imposed on each residential property and
associated nonresidential property, as specified in regulations adopted
by the Executive under Method
(l)
to administer this Section. The
regulations may define different classes of real property, depending on
the amount of impervious surface on the property, stormwater runoff
from the property, and other relevant characteristics, for purposes of
applying the [charge1 Charge.
*
(e)
Charge:
(l)
*
*
The regulations may allow credits against and exemptions from the
to the extent that credits and exemptions are not prohibited by
[state1 State law; and
(2)
if each credit or exemption will enhance water quality or
otherwise promote the purposes of this Article.
*
(g)
*
*
This Charge does not apply to any property located in a municipality in
the County which:
(1)
operates a stormwater management program that meets all
applicable federal, [state1 State, and County requirements and has
received any necessary federal or [state1 State permit; and
-@-
f:\law\bills\
1040
stormwater management-revisions\bill 2.doc
 PDF to HTML - Convert PDF files to HTML files
EXPEDITED BILL
No. 40·10
961
962
963
964
965
966
967
968
969
970
971
972
973
974
975
976
977
978
979
980
981
982
983
984
(2)
Imposes a similar charge or other means of funding its
stormwater management program in that municipality.
(h)
A person that believes that the Director of Environmental Protection has
mistakenly assigned a Charge to the person's property or computed the
Charge incorrectly may apply to the Director of Environmental
Protection in writing for a review of the Charge, and request an
adjustment to correct any error, [within 21 days after receiving a bill
for] not later than September 30 of the year that payment of the Charge
is due.
An aggrieved property owner may appeal the Director's
decision to the County Board of Appeals within 10 days after the
Director issues the decision.
ill
[If]
A person that believes that the Director of Environmental Protection
[denies any requested adjustment, the applicant may] has incorrectly
denied the person's request [reconsideration of the Director's denial in
writing within 10 days after the date of the denial.
An aggrieved
property owner] for
£
credit under subsection
(Q)
may appeal the
Director's [final] decision to the County Board of Appeals within 10
days after the Director issues the decision.
ill
The Board of Appeals may hear and decide all appeals taken from a
[final] decision of the Director of Environmental Protection under this
[subsection] Section as provided in Article
I
of Chapter 2A.
Sec. 2. Expedited Effective Date. The Council declares that this Act is
necessary for the immediate protection of the public interest. This Act takes effect on
the date [[on which]] when it becomes law.
.J8 ­
f:\Iaw\bills\1040 stonnwater managemenl-revisions\bill 2.doc
 PDF to HTML - Convert PDF files to HTML files
LEGISLATIVE REQUEST REPORT
Expedited Bill 40-10
Stormwater Management
DESCRIPTION:
PROBLEM:
Amends Chapter 19, Article II of the County Code to comply with
the Maryland Stormwater Management Act of 2007
The Stormwater Management Act of2007 requires the use of
environmentally sensitive site design (ESD) to the maximum extent
practicable on development and redevelopment sites and went into
effect on May 4, 2010. ESD encourages more stormwater to be
infiltrated into the ground rather than stored and released slowly.
ESD requires more surface areas to treat stormwater.
The County legislation mirrors the requirements in State law and
regulations for new development. Current County requirements are
more stringent than state requirements. This legislation maintains
those more stringent standards. This legislation also includes
provisions for grandfathering which were recently adopted by the
State in emergency regulations.
Department of Permitting Services, Department of Environmental
Protection
To be requested.
To be requested.
To be requested.
To be determined.
Rick Brush, Manager, Water Resources Plan Review, Department of
Permitting Services, 240-777-6343; Steve Shofar, Chief, Division of
Watershed Management, 240-777-7736
To be determined.
GOALS AND
OBJECTIVES:
COORDINATION:
FISCAL IMPACT:
ECONOMIC
IMPACT:
EVALUATION:
EXPERIENCE
ELSEWHERE:
SOURCE OF
INFORMATION:
APPLICATION
WITHIN
MUNICIPALITIES:
PENAL TIES:
Class A
 PDF to HTML - Convert PDF files to HTML files
OFFICE OF THE COUNTY EXECUTIVE
ROCKVILLE, MARYLAND 2{)850
lsiah Leggett
County Executive
MEMORANDUM
June 17,2010
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
Nancy
Floree~
Council President
Isiah Leggett, County Executiv_..-._
Proposed Legislation to Comply with the Stormwater Management Act of
2007
I am forwarding to the Council for introduction an Expedited Bill to revise
Chapter 19, Article II ofthe County Code to comply with State stormwater management
requirements. I am also forwarding a Legislative Request Report for this bill.
The Stormwater Management Act of 2007 (2007 Act), which sets the
minimum standards that the County law must meet, requires the use of Environmentally
Sensitive Site Design (ESD) to the maximum extent practicable (MEP) on new
development and redevelopment sites. The 2007 Act took effect on May 4, 2010. ESD
encourages stormwater to be infiltrated into the ground rather than stored in structural
facilities such as stormwater ponds and released slowly into the environment.
Prior to enactment of the 2007 Act, the County's stormwater requirements
for new development sites were the same as the State law requirements for new
development sites. This bill maintains that symmetry and adopts the same requirements
for new development that are included in the 2007 Act.
Prior to enactment of the 2007 Act, the County's stormwater management
requirements for redevelopment sites were more stringent than the State law requirements
for redevelopment sites. This bill maintains more stringent requirements for
redevelopment sites than those that are included in the 2007 Act. In essence, the bill
applies the same stormwater management requirements to new development and
redevelopment except that it provides more flexibility regarding the use of alternative
stormwater management measures for redevelopment sites'.
Before enactment of the 2007 Act, the State required stormwater
management for redevelopment sites
to
protect Water Quality. Specifically, the State
required management of the first inch of runoff from 20% of a redevelopment site. To
 PDF to HTML - Convert PDF files to HTML files
COlmcil President Floreen
Proposed Legislation
Stonnwater Management
Page 2
protect Water Quality, the 2007 Act requires management of the first inch ofnmoff from
50% of redevelopment site using ESD to the maximum extent practicable. County law
currently requires stonnwater management to protect Water Quality (the first inch of run­
off from 100% of the redevelopment site)
and
Channel Protection (the expected nmoff
from a I-year 24-hour duration rainfall event from 100% of a redevelopment site). This
bill maintains the same standards for redevelopment sites and requires the use of ESD to
the maximum extent practicable to meet these standards; The attached chart provides a
comparison of fonner and new State and County law requirements for both new
development and redevelopment.
This bill includes provisions recently adopted by the Maryland
Department of the Environment (MDE) in emergency regulations to implement the 2007
Act, which allow the County to grant administrative waivers from the new standards for
projects that have prior preliminary approvals.
For more infonnation on this bill, please contact Rick Brush, DPS Water
Resources Plan Review Manager, at 240-777-6343 or Steve Shofar, DEP Watershed
Management Division Chief, at 240-777-7736.
Attachments
cc:
Kathleen Boucher, Assistant Chief Administrative Officer
Carla Reid, Director, Department ofPennitting Services
Robert Hoyt, Director, Department of Environmental Protection
 PDF to HTML - Convert PDF files to HTML files
State and County Stormwater Requirements - Former and
Newt
New Development
Deimition
I
I
MDENew
I
-First flush
, -First 1" of rainfall
Channel
-Volume stored and
Protection siowly released
to
minimize erosion to
I
stream banks from
i
high velocities.
· -2.6" of rainfall
Recharge
Water
-ESD or
structural
-Structural
(unless
flows are
I
less that 2
-ESD
-ESDtoMEP
-Structural
where ESD not
possible
Required
Redevelopment
Definition
MDENew
-First flush
· -First I" ofrainfall
Channel
-Volume stored and
Protection slowly released
to
required
minimize erosion
to
stream banks from high
velocities.
I
· -2.6" of rainfall
Recharge -Volume
to
Not
-50% WQv
·ESDto MEP
-Not required
Required
1
"WQv" means Water Quality volume (first inch of runoff)
"CPV" means Channel Protection Volume (I-year 24-hour duration rainfall event). This
is
2.6
inches
in
Montgomery County.
"ESD" means Environmentally Sensitive Site Design.
"MEP" means Maximum Extent Practicable
 PDF to HTML - Convert PDF files to HTML files
Testimony ofDiane Cameron
Audubon Naturalist Society
Montgomery County Stormwater Partners Network
On Expedited Bill4-0-10,
Revisions to the Montgomery County Stormwater Code, Chapter 19.
My name is Diane Cameron and I am here today representing the Audubon.
Naturalist Society and the Montgomery County Stormwater Partners
Network. The Stormwater Partners represent 22 organizations comprising
more than 55,000 residents of Montgomery County.
The Stormwater Partners have been collaborating with the County Council
and County Executive since 2005 in crafting and improving Montgomery's
stormwater policies, programs, and funds.
We strongly support the bill's maintenance ofMontgomery's longstanding
.tradition of requiring the same Stormwater standards for both new
development and redevelopment. This is one of the reasons that
@
 PDF to HTML - Convert PDF files to HTML files
Montgomery COllilty has a reputation as a leader in the Stormwater field
regionally, statewide, and nationally.
In order to maintain and to increase our role as Stormwater leaders, though,
there are some necessary changes to some other provisions of this bill. We
'.,
are pleased that there are now two T &E worksessions scheduled on this
important legislation.
I want to highlight three changes that we request to Ex. Bill40-l0:
1) Please remove the waiver provision, Section 19-25 (c) (3), that
pertains to the stormwater capture and treatment requirements for
infill, redevelopment and projects with unspecified special
circumstances. This categorical waiver provision is superfluous,
could increase administrative and fiscal burdens, and slow or reverse
our efforts at restoring our degraded waters.
2) The bill's grandfathering provisions should be tightened to require that
all COllilty-owned project proposals, such as the Silver Spring Library,
and all private projects with substantial county subsidies, such as the
 PDF to HTML - Convert PDF files to HTML files
Wheaton Costco, that went into facility planning in or after Fiscal
Year 2009, comply with the new Environmental Site Design (ESD)
requirements. This is consistent with the Clean Water Task Force
recommendations of2007.
3) Though we recognize that off-site options are sometimes necessary,
they should be rare, and in keeping with current County practice,
should pertain to the meeting ofthe Channel Protection Volume only,
not the Water Quality Volume.
The Stormwater Partners have additional requests for changes to the Bill
regarding: tightening the requirements for off-site measures; making use of
public parkland for stormwater measures rare and only through a partnership
with the Parks Department; providing a reasonable public review and
comment opportunity for Concept Plans; establishing the Water Quality
Protection Charge as a fee-for-service; and substituting the term
"standard,"
rather than the word
"structural,"
to refer to non-ESD practices.
Thank you for considering our comments on this bill.
 PDF to HTML - Convert PDF files to HTML files
The Montgomery County Storrnwater Partners Network
The Honorable Nancy Floreen
President, Montgomery COWlty Council
100 Maryland Avenue
Rockville,
l\IID
July 13, 20}0
Dear Council President Floreen,
The Montgomery COWlty Stormwater Partners consist of22 organizations working together for the
protection and restoration ofMontgomery's streams, rivers, and lakes. We appreciate this opportunity
to convey our comments on Expedited Bill 40":10, containing proposed changes to our County's
stormwater regulations (Chapter 19 ofthe County Code). We ask that the Council engage the public in
full and careful consideration of these proposed code changes before they are voted upon,
We support several key aspects of the proposed stormwater code changes, including the continuance of
Montgomery's longstanding tradition of applying the same stormwater volume standards to both new
development and redevelopment projects.
It
is crucial that as we shift to Environmental Site Design as
the new norm, we maintain our tradition of requiring both new development and redevelopment
projects to capture and treat on-site, the first one-inch of each storm. Maintaining this strong standard
will further Montgomery's role as a regional and national leader in Stormwater management.
Other aspects ofBi1140-10 are counter to the. Storm water Management Act and/or existing County
. policy; the Council must remedy these problems before approving the ordinance: .
1) Please remove the waiver provision that pertains to the stormwater capture and treatment
requirements for infiIl, redevelopment and projects with unspecified special circumstances,
This categorical waiver provision is superfluous, because there is a general waiver provision
already in the code. Adding new waiver provisions could increase administrative and fiscal
burdens on Montgomery COWlty and slow or reverse our efforts at restoring the Anacostia,
Rock Creek and other waters. The provision is also at odds with existing County policy and
practice, and with the Stormwater Management Act. We therefore request that Section 19-25
(c) (3) of this bill be removed.
2) The bill's grandfathering provisions are too broad and lenient. The revised stormwater
ordinance should require that all County-owned project proposals, and all private projects with
substantial COWlty subsidies, that went into facility planning in or after Fiscal Year 2009,
comply with the new Environmental Site Design (ESD) requirements. This is consistent with
the 2007 Clean Water Task Force recommendations, and with the widely-acknowledged need
for the public sector to take the lead in applying ESD to new and redevelopment projects.
3) There are several provisions in this bill that enable off-site stormwater and stream restoration
projects to be undertaken in lieu of on-site ESD approaches. Though we recognize that off-site
options are sometimes necessary, they should be rare, and in keeping with current County
practice, off-site options should generally pertain to the meeting ofthe Channel Protection
Volume only, not the Water Quality Volume (roughly the first one inch of each storm is termed
the Water Quality Volume). Finally, the code should specify that the off-site device must itself
 PDF to HTML - Convert PDF files to HTML files
Montgomery County Storrnwater Partners Network
Letter to Council President Floreen regarding
Storrnwater Code, Chapter 19 Proposed Changes
(Expedited Bill 40-10)
July 13, 2010
be an ESD system.
4) Also related to off-site measures is the question of the use of public parkland for storrnwater
management. This is a very controversial topic, and the Code must be written such that this
approach is rarely undertaken. The bill must designate the Department (and Director) of Parks
as full partners in the process of deciding whether or not to allow placement of storrnwater
facilities on parkland, or to allow stream restoration or wetland restoration on parkland. Any
parkland projects should be ESD based, and should be required to show benefit to the watershed
from a hydrologic perspective.
5) The bill should include a requirement that DPS provide reasonable opportunity for public
review and input on proposed Concept Plans.
6) We request that Chapter 19 be amended to establish that the Water Quality Protection Charge is
a fee for service, not a tax.
7) Change the word
"structurar
to the word
"standard,"
since the Storrnwater Management Act
prioritizes ESD techniques over
standard
techniques. ESD techniques include bioretention and
green roofs, while standard techniques include storrnwater ponds and underground storage tanks
and sand filters; all are considered "structuraL" The current bill's use ofthe word
structural
would create confusion in the future, and could even hamper the growth of green businesses and
technology evolution in the ESD field, since designers and decisionmakers may erroneously
conclude that only
"non-structurar
measures constitute Environmental Site Design.
We will greatly appreciate your support of these needed changes to the expedited bill, and your partnership with
the public in a deliberative process to make this one of the best stormwater codes
in
Maryland.
Thank you for considering our request,
Diane M. Cameron
Steve Dryden
Co-Chairs, Montgomery County Storrnwater Partners
2
 PDF to HTML - Convert PDF files to HTML files
i3U.L
'10-
to
Page 1 of1
Mr:
Marin, Sandra
From: Linda Silversmith [linsil@usermail.com]
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Monday, July 12, 2010 11 :59 PM
Floreen's Office, Council member; Montgomery County Council
--
057960
Andrew's Office, Councilmember; Berliner's Office, Council member; Eirich's Office, Councilmember; Knapp's Office,
Council member; Ervin's Office, Councilmember; Trachtenberg's Office, Council member; Leventhal's Office,
Councilmember
Subject: Comments on expedited bill 40-10 - for Tues., July 13, 2010
Re: Expedited Bill 40-10, affecting the County's stormwater code, Chapter 19
Dear Council President Floreen and other Council members: :
I am writing to you concerning Expedited Bill 40-10. While the bill does maintain the County's longstanding tradition
and code requirement - - that redevelopment projects be required to manage the same stormwater volumes on-site as
new development projects in greenfields - - it unfortunately has grandfathering provisions that are much too sweeping
(that is, too broad and lenient).
It
will be important that the County Council take the time to
fu:
these provisions
rather than expediting Bill 40-10 in its present form. The bill in its present form could harm our local efforts to
restore the Anacostia River and our countywide efforts to restore degraded waters.
Indeed, Bill 40-10 as now written would make it easier for redevelopment, infill, phased, and other projects to apply for
(and some would say, to expect) water quality Environmental Site Design waivers from on"'site stormwater
management just because the project falls into one of the too-broad categories. I hope you will agree with me that these
potential loopholes are unprecedented in state and local stormwater policy and law, and are unacceptable.
Here are the provisions that particularly need modification before passage:
(1)
The revised stormwater ordinance should require that all County-owned project proposals - - and all private
projects with substantial county subsidies - - that went into facility planning in or after Fiscal Year 2009 comply with
the new Environmental Site Design (ESD) requirements. This is consistent with the 2007 Clean Water Task Force
recommendations. Grandfathering these projects does not
fit
with the County's goals of good stormwater
management.
(2) The proposed waiver eligibilities would make it easier for projects to be waived from the Water Quality volume
requirement, for on-site stormwater capture and treatment requirements for infill, redevelopment and phased projects,
and projects with unspecified special circumstances. Because such broad categorical waiver eligibility is counter to
existing County policy and practice, and to the Stormwater Management Act, these proposed waiver eligibilities
should be removed.
.
(3) Use of public parkland for off-site stormwater management should be discouraged. Consequently, please
ensure that the bill designate the Department (and Director) ofParks as full partners in the process of deciding whether
or not to allow placement of stormwater facilities on parkland, or to allow stream restoration or wetland restoration on
parkland.
I appreciate your consideration of my comments on Expedited Bill 40-10. I would also appreciate (a) being informed
how the Council plans to fully consider the public input it receives on this bill this month and
(b)
your own views on
this legislation.
Sincerely,
Linda Silversmith, Ph.D.
Biochemist/science writer
260 New Mark Esplanade
Rockville MD 20850-2733
301-294-0566
7/13/2010
 PDF to HTML - Convert PDF files to HTML files
MARYLAND-NATIONAL CAPITAL BUILDING INDUSTRY ASSOCIATION
173B Elton Road, Suite 200. Silver Spring, Maryland 20903
(301)445-5400 I
Fax
(301) 445-5489
Email. communications@;mncbiaorg
Website: vvwwmncbiaorg
EXeCUTIve COMMITTEE
EDWAf'D
'GJY'
R.
OJRIEf.
In
F'resI::Ienc
(U:Jerty Heme
Builder
Inc.)
J.II.'¥1ES
KETnffi
Vee
~tJCaIvert
County
O<ettler
Brothers
Homes LLC)
DOUG MEEKER
Vce PresidentJChaM9s County
(8m
Stneec
Development]
RD8Ef\T
J.
SPAUJI'JG
Vce R-esldertlMoncgomery County
(Mil.....
0;
Smith
HCnnes]
Maryland National Capital Building Industry Association
Comments on
Bill 40-10
Before the Cou nty Council
July 13/ 2010
Good Afternoon, Madame President and Councilmembers. My name is Bob Spalding.
This afternoon, I am here as Chair of the Montgomery County Liaison Committee
representing the Maryland National Capital Building Industry Association (MNCBIA). The
MNCBIA represents over 650 companies that strive to provide housing in Montgomery
County and six surrounding jurisdictions.
Thank you for the opportunity to testify before you today.
As noted by the County Executive's Transmittal letter, Bill 40-10, which has been reviewed
and approved by MOE,
mirrors
the State's Stormwater Act of 2007, except where current
Montgomery County law
exceeds
it.
The new state law went into effect on May 4 of this year and the County's adoption is
overdue.
The Stormwater Management Act of 2007 requires new development projects to
incorporate Environmental Site Design (ESD) to the Maximum Extent Practicable (MEP) to
control stormwater runoff.
WIiIt
the new state law requires a 50% impervious surface
reduction and enhanced stormwater controls for redevelopment projects,
".t!!Jll!' BIY
f!g
h
i
I
£
Ill.
In addition to the statutory provisions and regulations finalized in 2009, the Maryland
Department of Environment (MOE) has adopted additional regulatory guidance to
speCifically address transition for pipeline projects and clarification for alternative
treatment options for redevelopment projects. (Concerns raised by county and municipal
officials and the commercial and residential development industry culminated in a
collaborative negotiation during
the
2010 General Assembly Session in order to address
transition issues; the effort was led by House ENV Matters Committee Chair Maggie
Mdntosh, resulting in a brokered agreement with a wide-range of stakeholders, that
included 1000 Friends of Maryland, MACO, MML, NAIOP, Chesapeake Bay Foundation,
several Counties, and MSBA. The Emergency Regulations were approved on April 6, 2010.
The negotiated agreement allows for a waiver process for pipeline projects that meet
specific criteria and have received
preliminary project approval
by May 4, 2010. It is
important to note that the state's criteria for
"preliminary project approvcA"
is different
than Montgomery County's preliminary plan of subdivision. These projects, having used
current best management practices
to
address stormwater reqUirements, could be eligible
to move forward on the condition that they must receive final plan approval by May 4,
2013 and must complete construction by May 4 of 2017.
MARTY MITO-lEU.
Vee
R-esdent}Prince George's County
(Nltthe1l
0;
Sest
Har1ebuik:lers
LLC)
JOHN 3.
NCF\RIs'
III
Vee R-esident/St'. Mary's
County
(LBw
Otf\::e
of
JoIY1
B.
Norris :11 LLC)
8RI'IN
'A,J:
JAO<SDN
Vice
F'resden,!Washingwn DC
(EYA LLC)
FRANK 80SSDNG
rv
R.E.
Assocete
Vee
Presidet""J:
(Rodgers
Consuwg ",,-)
STEVE
NARDaLA
Treasurer
(W"chester Homes
""-J
DAVE
LUNCiB'l
Voce
President
Scate LegsJSecrecary
(Tmberl!l1<e
Hk:;nnes
he)
ROBERT A JAmeS
Life Director
(Acade
Federal
Savngs
8anI<J
THOMAS
M.
FAf'ASY
Immediate
Rest
Pn!siclenl:
(Terra
Verde ComfTlU"llbes
LLC)
STl3"Hi3'l
P. 8.MENJORF
Legal
Counsel
(U1awes
0;
Blocher.
LL"l
DIANE
«.
SWENSON, C4E
Executive VICe R-esident
SOARD OF DIREiCTOFlS
BILL BILO
CiCCl,1re.
HUAAY DOLT
C4HAN
Kor:cerra
MU<EOONl£Y
Wnchester Homes Inc.
TONYO'lANE
0"Sne
Hcrre5
TlrvlDTHY DUGAN
Shulman "agers
KENOL:NN
LoiecenT'a"'I Solcesz Assoc. rc
ROBERT HARRIS
Holland
0;
Knight LLF
HOWA?OKATZ
Md1aeI Hams HCmes
SAFlYKRET
Steuart.J<ret Homes
DAVID
llTl1.E
Gucschd<,
Ll::t!e
0;
Weber' PA
OWA~PARK~T~AYER
christopher consultants
ltd
ANDREA
LEAHY·PJOHEO<
Leahy
0;
Desmet
STl3"Hi3'l
PAUL
Md-At:lantic Builders.
Inc
NAND PORTEN
Por"'ten Q:mpanies
!nc.
KAREN RAOISCH
1st
Marner Barl<
IV1ARCROSE
Md>aeI T.
Rase Cornpai'Ves
ANDY ROSENTHAL
Rosenchal Homes
GARYRUlIND
Greer/1orre
0;
OMara.
Inc.
RONALD RYMER
Lenhart
Develcpment
Corp.
TED SMART
Marylard
Oeveloprrenc
Co.
LLC
RAY SOBRINO
Porte.r'l
D:lmpanies If'' 1c.
ClARo<
WAGNER
Bozzuw HCmes
Inc.
F1':GGY WHITE
Axiom Eng""""ng
Design
LLC
8RYAN
WHITTU\lGTO~J
BUILDING
HOMES, CREATING NEIGHBORHOODS
the Buildirg and Cevelopment Industry in Calvert Q-,arles, Mortgomery,
C.G
Georges and St: Mary's Counties and
Affiliated with the Maryland State Builders AssociatfJn and the National
of Home Builders
Q",nrp",onhr-I"1
Wh:tting:an CesigrBulld
o.FlTE"I WILLSON
Carter rc
@
 PDF to HTML - Convert PDF files to HTML files
MNCBIA Testimony on Bill 40-10
Before the Montgomery County Council
July1~2010
Page2of3
While the industry remains concerned about the potential negative impact that the SW Act of 2007
and Bill 40-10 could have on Smart Growth development and redevelopment, we believe that the Bill
recognizes the inherent constraints inhibiting redevelopment, and provides the County the flexibility
to balance the visions of the County/s IViaster Plans while achieving the legislative goals of increased
stormwater management, albeit thru an unclear and potentially economically-crippting path.
The timing of the CouncWs action on Bill 40-10 is critical because
state law required
adoption
by
May
4 ...
almost 3 months before your current process will
be
completed. This lag-time has placed
several projects, that meet the state/s requirements for administrative waivers and can/t apply or
move forward, in
"limbol/.
As explained by staff, any changes to the MDE-approved language will
delay the implementation of the Bill and increase the current uncertainty. While there are issues
that we believe need to be modified, we support keeping this adoption straight-forward with a
subsequent process to address issues raised by various stakeholders.
Rather than address the industryls concerns - over process, delegation of authority, and clarification
of
"MEptl
-
during worksessions on Bill 40-10 the BIA would look to the regulations for definitions.
The industry would ask that the regulations:
• clearly deSignate and define the Department of Permitting Services as the "lead
agencyll
on stormwater management procedures
• clarify the administrative waiver
criteria
l
as defined by the State through the MDE
regulations
set a time line for the administrative waiver submission, approval, and appeal
• define parties that are vested
The County is facing several federal, state, and local environmental initiatives that create mandates
that overlap, conflict, and duplicate requirements, often adding thousands of dollars to an
application, as well as extending the development approval process. The industry would ask that the
County evaluate these complex mandates, and prioritize them, given the limited resources available
to both the public and private sector.
The State's requirement that local jurisdictions monitorl identify and report back to the State any
impediments that restricts the ability to achieve Smart Growth development, as well as ESD to the
MEP, acknowledges that there is still much to be learned on what are the most effective tools that
canl
and should, be used when addressing stormwater, and environmental changes.
We believe that the state-mandated assessment should include a revisit to the County/s requirement
that 100% ESD be used when addressing stormwater runoff
on redevelopment and Smart Growth
sites.
We believe that a more practicable application, that requires 100% management of
stormwater, is to treat stormwater with a comprehensive approach that allows for broader-based
solutions (instead of site-restricted solutions), thereby providing a better 'bang for the buckl and
actual improvement of the County/s streams.
The BIA would stipulate that three critical components are miSSing in the discussion of how to
effectively manage stormwater:
 PDF to HTML - Convert PDF files to HTML files
MNCBIA Testimony on Bill
40-10
Before the Montgomery County Council
July
13r 2010
Page30f3
• County data that separates existing development from new development (see
attached pie charts on Maryland's Chesapeake Bay Model Results: Breakdown of All
land Uses)
o The BIA believes that only after the New Construction data is separated
from the Urban/Suburban category, can the County identify the most
efficacious approach to addressing stormwater management concerns on
redevelopment sites, especially where there is no SW. When this data was
dissected in EPA's Chesapeake Bay Phase 5.3 Model, only
0.2%
of the land
was in
new
development and
1.4.3%
was in existing development
According to Park
&
Planning
l
less than 4% of the
County/s
land is available
for new construction.
• clear understanding of what the new reqUirements will cost (the County Executive/s
Transmittal of the Bill did not include a fiscal impact analysis of the Bill 40-10, nor
did it acknowledge the link to the mandated retrofit activity that the County must
undertake to meet the MS4 requirements, so as to comply with the upcoming TMDl
[total maximum daily load]
)1
• cost- effectiveness of ESD on in-fill redevelopment sites and if they are
proportionate to the environmental benefits, which have only been modeled.
The BIA would ask that the Council request that these requirements, the resulting financial
obligation, and the data be part of long-term planning and Master Plans.
With these conSiderations, and reservations, the BIA supports the adoption of Bill 40-10 as approved
by MDE and asks that the Council move to pass the Bill by July 27. We are available for questions
today, and during upcoming worksessions. Thank you.
Attachments:
5B 784: 5tormwater Management Act of 2007
The 5tormwater Management Act of 2007 - Proposed Time Line for Regulation Adoption (Dec 14, 2007 - Dec 31, 2008)
Maryland Department of the Environment: 5tormwater Management Regulations: Guidance for Implementation of Local
5tormwater Management Programs, March 2010
Comparison of requirements for Implementation of 5W Requirements per the SWA of 2000 vs SWA of 2007
Task Force on the Future for Growth and Development in Maryland Stormwater Management Forum· January 15,
2010: presenters List
PHASE 3 Chesapeake
Bay
Model Results
o
Breakdown of
all land
uses
o
Breakdown of Maryland
Urban
Land Uses
o
Breakdown of Maryland
total Nitrogen Loading
by
Land Uses
o
Breakdown of Maryland
total Phosphorous Loading
by
Land Uses
o
Breakdown of Maryland
total Sediment Loading
by
Land Uses
 PDF to HTML - Convert PDF files to HTML files
:MARTIN O'MALLEY, Governor
Ch. 121
CHAPTER 121
(Senate Bill 784)
AN ACT concerning
Stormwater Management Act of 2007
FOR the purpose of
Fe€fl;lir-iftg eel"ia-ift l€leal
g€lVSFftmSftts t€l Ul'eats lsl"iaift 2'l€lrnftg
lFmftaft€les t€l all€lVl feF the -imf}lemefttati€lft lf eeFtaift eftvir€lftmefttal site eesigR
t8@hrn€iuss
if'}:
@el"iaift st€lFmWateF maftagemeftt I'raeti@8s;
requiring the
Department of the Environment to adopt regulations that establish certain
regulations and a certain model ordinance
eF meeel F8gulat-i€lft
for certain
purposes; requiring the Department to adopt regulations that specify certain
criteria for certain stormwater management plans
afte e8Ftaift stEH:'fl¥llater
@8fttF81 8Feiftaftees;
Fe~Fiftg
the Del'aFtmeftt
h
ae8f}t regulati€ l fts that sf}eeifY
eel"iaift eWliF8ftmefttal site eesigR te@ooi€!Ues as the l'flmary meth8e fer
maftagiBg st8rm',vater UE:eer @ertaift @ireumstaft@es;
requiring the Department
to adopt regulations that establish a certain comprehensive process for
approving certain grading and sediment control plans and certain stormwater
management plans; requiring the Department,
8ft 81' BefeFe a @el"iaiB €late, ts
F€wieVl a @el"iaift fee system tifte estaBlish a l8FtaiB s€lh@eule If fees fte€lessaFY t€l
8ft!€lF@e eeFtaift f}F€l'risi€lfts lf law
to evaluate certain options and report certain
findings on or before a certain date; requiring the Department to seek certain
input and work with certain parties in the creation of certain regulations and a
certain model ordinance; defining certain terms; and generally relating to
stormwat;r management.
BY adding to
Article - Environment
Section 4-201.1
Annotated Code of Maryland
(1996 Replacement Volume and 2006 Supplement)
BY repealing and reenacting, with amendments,
Article - Environment
Section
4:
292
aBe
4-203
Annotated Code of Maryland
(1996 Replacement Volume and 2006 Supplement)