Expedited Bill No.
11-12
Concerning:
County
Property
Disposition
Revised: 5-1-12
Draft No._8_
Introduced:
March 13,2012
Enacted:
May 1, 2012
Executive:
Disapproved May 14, 2012
Re-enacted: May 15, 2012
Effective:
May 15, 2012
Sunset Date: ..:..:N""o.:..:;ne"'-_ _ _ _-:-:-_
Ch.
~.
Laws of Mont. Co.
2012
COUNTY COUNCIL
FOR MONTGOMERY COUNTY, MARYLAND
By: Councilmembers Leventhal and EIrich, Council President Berliner,
and Councilmembers Andrews, Riemer, and Navarro
AN EXPEDITED ACT
to:
(1)
modify the procedures to dispose of County property;
(2)
require the County Council to approve certain [[dispositions of]] actions regarding
certain County properties.)IDd authorize the Council to review certain agreements to
dispose of County propgty;
ill
prohibit the Countv from disposing of certainJRQJ2¥rtv at less than full market value,
unless the Council waivruhis requirement and
([(3)])
ill
generally amend the County law regarding disposition of County property.
By amending
Montgomery County Code
Chapter lIB, Contracts and Procurement
Section 11B-45
Boldface
Underlining
[Single boldface brackets]
.Double underlining
[[Double boldface brackets]]
* * *
Heading or defined term.
Added to existing law by original bill.
Deletedfrom existing law by original bill.
Added by amendment.
Deletedfrom existing law or the bill by amendment.
Existing law unaffected by bill.
The County Council for Montgomery County, Maryland approves the following Act:
 PDF to HTML - Convert PDF files to HTML files
EXPEDITED SILL
No. 11-12
1
Sec.
1.
Section 11B-45 is amended as follows:
11B-45.
(a)
Disposition of real property.
The County Executive must adopt regulations to establish a process for
the disposition of any real property owned or controlled
Qy
the County,
other than surplus school facilities and [other] property of nominal value
identified in the regulation.
[[As used in this Section, "disposition"
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
means
~
sale,
~
lease or license for
~
term of
J
years or longer, or
~
lease
or other document which includes an option to buy.]] The regulations
must provide for:
(1)
coordination among public agencies, including any [municipal
corporation] municipality in which the real property is located;
(2)
(3)
opportunity to reserve property for alternative public use;
comparative analysis of reuse proposals before any disposition
actions; and
(4) public notice and hearing on possible dispositions before final
decision on disposition, except that the County Executive may
waive the public hearing requirement for any real property that:
(A) has nominal value; or
(B) is recommended to be reused by the County government.
(hl
As used in this Secti{)n, disposition means a
sal~,
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
a lease or license for a
term of [U]] 2
j'~ars
or longer, or a lease or other document which
includes an optjon to buy. If a license or lease for an initial term of less
than [Un 2 years is extended or renewed beyond [U]LLyears, tilat
extension or renewal is a disposition. Disposition does not include:
22
23
24
25
26
ill
a lease of or license to use any parkl(llld, or anyfacility locatedon
parkland, that the Parks Department operates ormanagesfor the
County~
27
-2­
 PDF to HTML - Convert PDF files to HTML files
EXPEDITED BILL
No.
11-12
28
29
aJ
ill
(i)
a license to use County property that is coterminous with a
contractfor services performed by the licensee;
[[Qr]]
a . license to. use County propertY.J9 provide child or adult day
care services; [[or]]
a sale or lease of property to the Housing Opportunities
Commission for housing development:
30
31
32
33
34
35
ill
a sale of one or more housing units obtained by the County using
its right of first refusal under Section l1A-3 or lIA-4, ChaW,r
75A, or Chapter 53A, and resold for not less than the County
paici; or
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
(Q)
a transfer of County right-of-way that is needed to implement a
road or transit proNct that is included in the applicable master or
other land use plan.
Uil
Unless the County C()uncil waives this requirement under subsection
(e)(2)CB), the Executive must not dispose of any property owned or
controlled by the County at less than full market value.
In
case of a sale
of property, full market value must be determined by at least one
professional appraisal of the property obtained by the Director within
[[the previous]]
[[!in
12 months before a declaration is submitted to the
Council.
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
@
Before seeking Council approval of a declaration of no further l1eed
under subsection eel, the Ex:.ecutive must submit to the Council and
allow the Council at least 30 days to COJllJ1lent on:
51
52
53
54
ill
all material terms of the disposition, including the price or rent to
be pai<i and any associated economic incentives: and
aJ
any appraisal.that the Executive relied on or will rely on in setting
the property's market value.
-3­
 PDF to HTML - Convert PDF files to HTML files
EXPEDITED BILL
No. 11-12
55
56
57
58
In addition. the Executive should when practicable submit for prior
Council review the parameters and material terms of a disposition that
has not begun to be negotiated. Any document submitted under this
subsection, [[other than any document submitted under the preceding
sentence which]] to the extent the document need not be disclosed under
state law, [[is a public document)] must be treated as confidential.
[[®]]
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
W
[rnefore]]
In
addition to the process required under subsection
C~1
before the disposition of any real property owned or controlled
Qy
the
County (other than
~
property which has either nominal value or an
finaln)]]~
appraised value lower than
$100,000)
becomes
ill
the Executive must publish a declaration in the County Register
and post a notice on the County website that the County has no
further need for the property Qr, if the disposition is a lease or
license. has no further need for the property during the term of
the lease or license; and
68
69
70
71
(2J
the [[County]] Council,
Qy
resolution adopted after the Council
holds
~
public hearing with at least
Q
days advance notice, must
72
73
74
approve:
[[ill]]
CA)
the [[disposition]] Executive's declaration of no
further
n~eJl;.
and
75
76
77
78
[[ill]]
au
[[all material terms of the disposition, including the
price or rent to be paid and any associated economic
incentives.]] any disposition of the property at Jess than
full market value.
79
The Director must adjust the
$100,000
floor in this subsection on July
J
every third year by the percentage increase ordecrease in the applicable
Consumer Price Index. or any successor index. during the previous 3
-4­
80
81
 PDF to HTML - Convert PDF files to HTML files
EXPEDITED BILL No.
11-12
82
calendar y(;!ars. rounded to the nearest $1000. The Council may waive
the public hearing required by this subsection if it concludes that a
hearing on a particular proposed disposition is not necessary to
assess the proposed action.
pr~merly
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
If the Council does not act under this
subsection within 60 days after the Executive has submitted
[[aU
information necessary to assess]] the proposed actio
l1•
the m:oPQsed
actio.!} is automatically approved. The Council may extend [[this]] the
60-cl~y
deadline by resolution if the Council President has informed the
day~
Executive, within 30
after the Executive submitted the proposed
action, that the Council has not received all information necessary to
review the proposed action. If [[this]] the60-day deadline would fall
during August or from December 15 through December 31. the deadline
is automatically extended until the next scheduled Council session.
This subsection and subsection (c) do not apply to any disposition of
property that will be used primarily for housing development if the
recipient legally commits to the Director of the Department of Housing
and Community Affairs that at least 30% of the housing units built on
the property will be moderately priced dwelling units or other units that
are exempt from the development impact tax under Section 52-49(g)(l)­
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
ffi
[(b)]
[[W1]
ill
*
*
*
[(c)]
[[@]]
(g)
The Executive must adopt regulations to establish a process for
disposition of surplus schools. As used in this Section, "surplus school"
means any building used at any time as a public school and later
conveyed to the County and all or part of the land which constitutes the
school site[, and "disposition" means a sale or a lease with an option to
buy]. The regulations must provide for:
-5­
 PDF to HTML - Convert PDF files to HTML files
EXPEDITED BILL
No.
11-12
109
110
[(d)]
[[ill]]
ilil
*
*
*
*
*
*
III
112
Sec. 2. Expedited Effective Date; Applicability.
The Council declares that this legislation is necessary for the immediate
protection of the public interest. This Act takes effect on the date when it becomes
law. County Code Section IlB-45. as amended by Section 1 of this Act, [[illJ-plies]]
does not apply to any disposition of County pr9perty [[completed on or after]] for
which a legally enforceable contract. lease, or other agreement was signed by all
parties before that date.
Sec. 3. Applicability - White Flint Sector Plan area.
Section 1IB-45Cb)-Ce), as amended by Section 1 of this Act. does not apply to
any sale by the County of real property located in the boundaries of the White Flint
Sector Plan if:
113
114
115
116
11 7
118
119
120
121
122
123
W
(Q)
the property was acquired by the County from the State Highway
Administration;
the property was
originally acquired by the
State Highway
124
125
Aclministration to construct Montrose Parkway; and
126
!£l
the sale by the County is completed on or before Decem1?er 31, 2012.
-6­
 PDF to HTML - Convert PDF files to HTML files
EXPEDITED BILL
No. 11-12
127
Approved:
128
Roger
129
Approved:
130
DISAPPROVED
Isiah Leggett, County Executive
5/14/2012
Date
131
This is a correct copy ofCouncil action.
132
Linda M. Lauer, Clerk of the Council
Date
- 7­
 PDF to HTML - Convert PDF files to HTML files
OFFICE OF THE COUNTY EXECUTIVE
ROCKVILLE, MARYLAND 20850
Isiah Leggett
County Executive
MEMORA.."NDUM
May 14, 2012
TO:
Roger Berliner, President
County Council
-")
lsiah Leggett
County ExecutIve
FROM:
~~'F=-----
/
/7
0
-..., ­
vJ
SUBJECT:
Bill 11-12, County Property Disposition - Veto
After careful consideration of Bill 11-12, County Property Disposition, I have
reluctantly decided to veto the bill, and I am returning the bill to you with this memorandum. I
acknowledge the importance of timely notice to and consultation with Council regarding
property dispositions and appreciate Council's comprehensive review of the issues in this area.
However, Bill 11-12 creates several new layers of Council oversight that have potential to cause
delays, uncertainties, and increased costs for County government and private entities that do
business with the County. I believe there is a more constructive way to enhance Council
oversight of the types of transactions that Council cares most about.
The Council is already vested with broad authority regarding disposition of
County property. Existing laws governing master plans, zoning text amendments, the annual
capital budget, the six-year Capital Improvements Program (CIP), the annual operating budget,
and the Economic Development Fund give the Council extensive authority over use and .
disposition of County property at various stages in the process.
The current Executive Regulations governing disposition of County property
ensure that dispositions are "done in a fair and equitable manner that is open to public scrutiny"
(COMCOR IlB.45.01 et. seq.). These regulations invite review and comment from all
stakeholders at various stages in the process, including County Agencies, Outside Agencies (e.g.,
MNCPPC, MCPS, and municipalities), the public, and the Council. However, the regulations
have some extremely broad exemptions.
The exemptions included in the final version of Bill 11-12 suggest that the bill is
aimed primarily at the disposition of property relating to economic development, redevelopment,
and capital improvements. If Council's genuine interest is to have an opportunity "early in the
process" for review and comment on these types of property dispositions, the existing regulations
referenced above could be amended to eliminate some current exemptions so that the regulations
are applicable to all dispositions relating to economic development, redevelopment, and capital
montgomerycountymd.gov /311
240-773-3556
TTY
 PDF to HTML - Convert PDF files to HTML files
Roger Berliner, President
May 14, 2012
Page 2
improvements. The regulations could also be amended to require that the Reuse Analysis be
provided to Council for review and comment earlier than is now required. I would be willing to
propose such amendments as an alternative to this bill.
I have specific concerns about particular components of the bill.
Section 11B-45(a) requires the Executive to promulgate regulations that establish
a process for the disposition of any property "controlled by the County" in addition to property
owned by the County, as specified in current law. The County Attorney believes that this
appears to make the bill applicable to the process used by the Office of Community Use of
Public Facilities(CUPF) for making schools and County-owned buildings available for public
use. For example, the bill would apply to the situation where a church or cultural school reaches
the end of the 2
nd
year of use at a facility.
In
such a case, the Council would be required to
approve the extension of the CUPF permit. Moreover, the Council would most likely have to
waive the below market fees charged by CUPF..
Section 11B-45(d) requires the Executive to submit to Council for review and
comment "all material terms of the disposition, including the price or rent to be paid and
associated economic incentives" before seeking Council approval of a declaration of no further
need for the property. That same subsection also includes the following language:
"In
addition,
the Executive should when practicable submit for prior Council review the parameters and
material terms of a disposition that has not begun to be negotiated." Certainly, price or rent is a
"material term" of a disposition, but this term may not have been negotiated prior to obtaining
Council declaration of no further need. Nevertheless, the bill appears to mandate that this
information be provided at that stage. At the very least, this is confusing. More troubling, is the
likelihood that providing this information to Council so close to the stage when the Council
makes the declaration of no further public need invites the Council to make its decision on
whether to "surplus" the property on a basis that should be irrelevant to whether the County has
no further need of the property.
Section 11B-45(b)(3) exempts "a license to use County property to provide child
or adult day care services." This exemption is narrow and, therefore, leaves open to argument
the issue of whether school property that is available for use by a day care facility (and scheduled
by CUP F) is within the purview ofBi1l11-12. Currently, day care facilities have a license issued
by CUPF to use school property that is usually renewed for up to 5 years. Whether the County
has "control" for purposes ofBi1l11-12 is ambiguous. Moreover, the issue of who controls this
space is the subject of on-going litigation. The County is currently taking the position in this
litigation that the County does not control this space, but Bill 11-12 may muddy the waters.
Bill 11-12 includes an exemption for disposition of property that will be used
primarily for housing deVelopment if the recipient legally commits to the Director of the
Department of Housing and Community Affairs that at least 30% of the housing units built on
the property will be moderately priced dwelling units or other units that are exempt from the
development impact tax. During final action on the bill and in response to direct questioning,
 PDF to HTML - Convert PDF files to HTML files
Roger Berliner, President
May 14,2012
Page 3
Council legal staff indicated that this exemption is not intended to apply to most mixed use
developments. In my mind, there is no valid reason for this distinction.
Under Section l1B-45(e), Council has discretion to extend the statutory deadline
for approving a declaration of no further need or disposition of property at less than full market
value. This discretion creates opportunities for delays that could "kill" prudent property
dispositions that serve the public interest.
The provisions of Bill 11-12 which give Council veto authority over property
dispositions below full market value could undermine the long term credibility of the County in
its negotiations with private parties. Typically, responses to solicitations for pUblic/private
partnerships resulting in land disposition are evaluated on objective criteria relating to the
offerors' qualifications, experience, and financial capability. Business terms and monetary offers
are seldom part of solicitations. The primary reason for this is because the County has multiple
policy objectives and those objectives do not always translate into a high/low bid scenario in
which property values playa significant role in what ultimate deal is judged to be in the best
public interest. Requiring Council notice and approval of dispositions at less than full market
value adds to the complexity of such negotiations and the role property values play in striking a
best value deal. While I understand that this Council explicitly stated that this is not its intent,
the potential for Council negating lengthy and complex negotiations because it disagrees on a
single point -- property valuation -- is extremely troublesome.
Finally, I note that the grandfather clause included in Bjll11 12 is too narrow to
protect the County investment of time, money, and good will in numerous property dispositions
currently underway and in various stages ofthe process, including transactions for which: (1) a
Request for Proposal (RFP) or Request for Expression of Interest (REOI) has been issued but no
responses received; (2) responses to an RFP or REOI have been received and are being
evaluated by the County; (3) the County has selected a bidder for an RFP or REOI but
negotiations have not yet begun; (4) the County has selected a bidder for an RFP or REOI and
negotiations are underway; or (5) the County has signed a letter of intent to execute a sale, lease,
license, general development agreement or other binding contract.
For all oftl+e reasons discussed above, I am vetoing Bi1l11-12 and
Council to reconsider its vote to support this bilL
c:
Kathleen Boucher, Assistant Chief Administrative Officer
David Dise, Director, Department of General Services
Marc Hansen, County Attorney
Art Holmes, Director, Department of Transportation
Rick Nelson, Director, Department of Housing and Community Affairs
Steve Silverman, Director, Department of Economic Development
the