AGENDA ITEM 10C
December 8, 2015
Introduction
MEMORANDUM
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
County Council
Jeffry
L.
zyon('i:nior Legislative Analyst
Introduction:
Bill 52-15, Administrative Procedures
Summary Decision
Bill 52-15, Administrative Procedures- Summary Decision, is scheduled to be introduced
on December 8,
2015.
The Lead Sponsor is Council President Floreen at the request ofthe Hearing
Examiner. A public hearing is tentatively scheduled for January 12,2016 at 1:30 p.m.
Bill 52-15 would revise the Administrative Procedures Act to allow a summary decision
without an evidentiary hearing when there are no facts at issue.
This packet contains:
Bi1152-15
Legislative Request Report
Circle
#
1
3
F:\LAW\BILLS\1552 Summary ]udgement\lntro Memo.Docx
 PDF to HTML - Convert PDF files to HTML files
Bill No.
52-15
Concerning: Administrative Procedures ­
Summary Decision
Revised: 12-2-15
Draft No. 3
Introduced:
December 8, 2015
Expires:
June 8, 2017
Enacted: _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __
Executive: _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __
Effective: _--:---:-_ _ _ _ _ __
Sunset Date: -'-"No=n:..::'e-:----::-_ _ __
Ch, _ _, Laws of Mont. Co. _ __
COUNTY COUNCIL
FOR MONTGOMERY COUNTY, MARYLAND
Lead Sponsor: Council President at the request of the Hearing Examiner
AN
ACT
to:
(1)
(2)
revise the Administrative Procedures Act to allow a summary decision without an
evidentiary hearing; and
generally amend the law governing administrative procedures.
By amending
Montgomery County Code
Chapter 2A, Administration
Section 2A-7
Boldface
Underlining
[Single boldface brackets]
Double underlining
[[Double boldface brackets]]
."
."
."
Heading or defined term
Added to existing law by original bill.
Deletedfrom existing law by original bill.
Added by amendment.
Deletedfrom existing law or the bill by amendment.
Existing law unqffected
by
bill.
The County Council for Montgomery County, Maryland approves the following Act:
 PDF to HTML - Convert PDF files to HTML files
BUNo.52-15
1
2
Sec.
1.
Section 2A-7 is amended as follows:
2A-7. Pre-hearing procedures.
3
4
5
*
(d)
*
*
Summary Decision.
Any.Qm:!Y may file
~
motion for summruy decision
at least 20 days before the date of
~
hearing. The hearing authority may
grant summruy decision if the hearing authority fmds that there is no
genuine issue of material fact to be decided at the hearing. The hearing
authority must give all other parties at least 10 days to respond to the
motion for summary decision before deciding the motion. The hearing
authority may permit oral argument on the motion.
6
7
8
9
10
11
.cru
Restrictions on data.
Unless a matter
has
been formally certified for
hearing by the hearing authority, government documents or records shall
not be subject
to
these provisions.
In
the event a matter is certified for
hearing by the hearing authority, any documents or records not to be used
at the hearing shall not be subject to the provisions of this chapter.
Further, any matter or materials which are designated by law as
confidential shall not be released without a waiver of the parties to the
confidentiality.
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
Approved:
21
Nancy Floreen, President, County Council
Date
22
Approved:
23
Isiah Leggett, County Executive
Date
f:lJaw\bills\1552 summary judgement\biU3.docx
 PDF to HTML - Convert PDF files to HTML files
LEGISLATIVE REQUEST REPORT
Bill 52-15
Administrative Procedures
-
Summary Decision
DESCRIPTION:
The will would amend the Administrative Procedures Act to
all
a
hearing authority to come to conclusion without an evidentiary
hearing when there are no facts at issue.
Maryland Courts only allow a summary decision to be made when
that procedure is allow by law. Currently the authority for summary
decisions is not in County Code having for an inefficient hearing
process.
The Bill will make the hearing process more efficient.
Merit System Protection Board, Landlord Tenant Affairs
Commission, the Commission on Common Ownership, the Human
Rights Commission and the Office of Zoning and Administrative
Hearings
To
be
requested.
To be requested.
To be requested.
To be researched.
Consultations with Boards, Commissions, and offices
To be researched.
PROBLEM:
GOALS AND
OBJECTIVES:
COORDINATION:
FISCAL IMPACT:
ECONOMIC
IMPACT:
EVALUATION:
EXPERIENCE
ELSEWHERE:
SOURCE OF
INFORMATION:
APPLICATION
WITHIN
MUNICIPALITIES:
PENALTIES:
NA
F:\LAw\BILLS\J
552
Summary Judgement\LRRDocx